Best of the T20, more imports and State's mistake

Last updated 13:40 25/06/2009

 The next time Andrew Eade, David Cooper, Blair Furlong, Gavin Larsen, Lee Germon and Ross Dykes get together for a chinwag about the state of domestic cricket, one of the items on the unofficial agenda may well be: "What the hell are we going to call the domestic cricket competitions?" The Championship, The Shield and The Twenty20 are all we have at the moment after State pulled the pin this month or as it was put officially:

"New Zealand Cricket has confirmed it is exploring new sponsorship opportunities for its domestic cricket programmes next summer..."

But another more interesting conversation for the CEOs of the provincial branch offices of NZC would be around whether New Zealand should relax its rules around the use of offshore players in our domestic cricket competitions.

At present, the major association teams are allowed to have one "import" with no ties to New Zealand in each team, hence the appearance of blokes like Stephen Croft (Auckland), Dimitri Mascarenhas (Otago), the Indian team's roped-in Test specialists Rahul Dravid, VVS Laxman, Murali Vijay, Amit Mishra, Dhawal Kulkarni and Laxmipathi Balaji), Hamish Marshall (ND), and of course Graham Napier (Wellington):

"Graham has been preparing for this breakthrough for such a long time he is now able to take the plaudits in his stride where many may have become sidetracked by such new-found fame..." (More outrageous dribbling hyperbole at his website.)

Having pledged allegiance to New Zealand's red stars, the Saffer-born trio of Neil Wagner (Otago), Johann Myburgh and Kruger van Wyk (Canterbury) are all classed as non-imports, although none are yet available for the full New Zealand side.

With the admission of the champion domestic Twenty20 team to the BCCI's multimillion-dollar Champions League Money Scramble starting on October 8 in India, the stakes for domestic cricket have soared. With that increased focus comes an increased desire to win, and it is a reasonable expectation that the provincial CEOs will be working out a way to negotiate the inevitable politics that will ensue when they make a case for devoting all their "import" contract budget to getting a superstar in for a few weeks of slap and tickle T20 rather than a few months of four-day cricket in front of nobody.

As an aside, if I was the State sponsorship manager, I sure as hell would have been keen to retain the rights to the TTPKAT (The Tournament Previously Known As The) State Twenty20 because it is likely to be the one generating the most headlines read by the most Kiwis in 2009/10.

As another aside, if the Beige Brigade was in charge The Twenty20 would be held at beach venues too: Whangarei, Taupo, Mt Maunganui, Tauranga, Waikanae, Nelson, New Plymouth and Queenstown would do the trick, and the final would be a best of three over two days at the venue of the top qualifier's choosing.

I think the rules should be relaxed to allow two import players in each team, with NZC allocating some money to hire the second gun. A few weeks in New Zealand in January could be quite appealing to many cricketers around the world. And who should the CEOs be looking at hiring? Well here are the top 20 performers at the recent ICC Twenty20 Championships - a decent place to start for sure...  Note too that the Australian provinces are already on to it - #3 Dwayne Bravo is off to Victoria, #1 Shahid Afridi is in line to join New South Wales and Western Australia have previous ties to swingin' #6 Umar Gul. Let's hope the Kiwi chin-wagging turns to action sometime very soon.

Rediff Top20 MVP

See the Top 100 at Rediff here.

**********

-> This week's episode of The BYC - the Beige Brigade podcast: In Episode 93 , the "Rheineck Lager Episode", we find out about Arnie's place of abode, The Regular Correspondent is outraged at The Rus, News or Ruse celebrates Father's Day, the NZC contracted 20 is speculated upon, a member of The BYC is labelled the Exchange4Free sellout of the week, and the Woman Slayer drafts in Phil Tufnell  for a criminal Ashes song...listen in to the streaming version just below...nail the RSS feed for your Pod catcher...or visit The BYC page on iTunes.

-> Follow the Beige Brigade on TWITTER here.

-> KIT UP in Beige Brigade clobber here

34 comments
Post a comment
paulimus_prime   #1   03:15 pm Jun 25 2009

Totally agree about cricket needing to be played at more beach towns - I think NZ cricket should return for a day night game or 20/20 at Taupo especially around new years - it will be PACKED every year!

Dr Zoidberg   #2   05:47 pm Jun 25 2009

You're not wrong Holden. A game of T20 played at a beachside location, balmy conditions, cold beer, a few internationals running around, bah dah, it's the stuff of dreams....

Reg Corres   #3   07:54 pm Jun 25 2009

Interesting observation that there is only one Indian player in the top twenty performers. I would have thought they would do better considering they created the IPL and the ICL.

Unwell   #4   12:49 pm Jun 26 2009

No English players either and they invented the game! Now where have I heard that before...

Interestingly enough Yuvraj is the only player outside the four teams that made the semis. Makes me wonder about the scoring system used.

The Holden   #5   01:20 pm Jun 26 2009

Unwell: Makes sense that the best players were in the top 4 teams. Yuvraj did bloody well - perhaps he will be the only one not annihilated by the Indian public for their failure. Were you expecting Neil Broom in there somewhere?!

Reg Corres   #6   10:19 pm Jun 26 2009

So the list of 20 players is out. While it is hard to argue with the list, I am wondering whether 20 players is enough. Over the last 12 months we have used 31 players in international cricket, 24 of whom have played 5 or more games. With more games being played these days I am wondering whether we should consider increasing the number to allow guys like Tuffey, Fulton etc the opportunity to practice all year around and stay in form for the inevitable injuries. Australia currently contracts 25 players, I think we should increase our number to a similar level, even if it means reducing the pay.

John Patrick   #7   10:11 am Jun 27 2009

Injuries happen to all squads. Besides, we have a lack of talent as it is so why make it any easier for them? Where would the incentive be for them? As the difference in pay from a NZ contract to just a provincal contract can be quite large of course.

The likes of Aussie clearly have 25 players who can play the game, the ones left out would walk into our squad. Players like How, Fulton, Gillespie etc need to sort their games out, and not be given an easy hand out.

Unwell   #8   01:44 pm Jun 29 2009

Holden - Careful what you say about Broom, he's an essential part of the NZ squad don't you know? Thought Pieterson or Broad may have been close to that list but hey who really cares anyway...

As for the top 20 list, Arnel was a surprise to me as he hasn't played for NZ yet. My heart says he's another trundler in the typical 'keep the score down but don't trouble the batsman' NZ mould but my head says "Remember you were wrong about O'Brien". So I'm prepared to give him a chance as he has performed pretty well at NZ A level over the past couple of years.

McIntosh will get this series against SL but I don't really expect much from him before the selectors spin the NZ opener wheel of mis-fortune again. As always I hope I'm wrong - don't really like being a pessimist, honest.

John Patrick   #9   04:17 pm Jun 29 2009

It's reality, Unwell. As Martin Crowe was asked last year - ''Why do we go through so many openers''? ''Because they get given 4 or 5 tests and don't deliver'' was his answer. Which is enough. And a lot of them look incredibly ordinary too, let alone not getting many runs of course. That's why I prefer experimenting with the likes of Flynn as an opener. Has the technique for it anyway. And why we need to look at new players like Broom, rather than the same ol' same old. As Dylan Cleaver said on Sunday we have a lot of middling cricketers here. And a lot of that comes down to too many feeling comfortable. Look at what Deans does in rugby. Regardless of reputation if your forms not there - you're out. Ask Merthens and Lote Tiquiri. And who does he pick instead now? An 18 year old in James O'Connor. Aussie once chose two 19 year olds and a senior B hooker in Horan, Little and Kearns. Two years later they won a WC. Yet here we just accept mediocrity. Not to say we should pick a bucket load of kids and if so we'll win a WC. But we have to break the mould here. Because like Aussie rugby, we only have a talent pool so big as well.

ivor bigun   #10   01:38 pm Jun 30 2009

Holden - am I allowed to blog-slap JP for talking about the other sport? or do you want to do it?


Show 11-34 of 34 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content