Opener slather

Last updated 10:30 08/12/2009

Just in, news from Captain Obvious: the state of opening partnerships in the New Zealand Test cricket team is diabolical. After a prescient article from Cricinfo, and another abominable return, the selectors have swung the axe, albeit a blunt plastic tomahawk rather than a weapon capable of multiple beheadings.

But is there a light on yonder horizon in the form of yesterday's announcement that Tokoroa's finest opening batsman of all time, BJ Watling, is to step into the large but less than run-filled boots vacated by Peter Fulton?

A brand new partnership of McIntosh and Watling does not exactly have huge expectations to live up to. In the past two years, New Zealand opening pairings have mournfully trudged out to bat 40 times, and very soon after, one or the other batsman has been re-trudging back.

In fact, the average partnership is just 19: merely making it out of the teens would be a rare success, so lowly set is the bar. And if the aim of the game is occupation then once again, making it past the teens would be above the recent par: of the 40 innings, we've made it past the 20th over just four times.

 NZ loses its first wicket (Dec 07-Dec 09)

After     20 overs +         4 times

            15-19 overs       2 times

            10-14 overs       7 times

            5-9 overs           10 times

            0-4 overs           17 times

 

In those two years, six different combinations have been tried. The highest opening effort was from How and Redmond in the first innings at Manchester - they knocked up 80 under the cloudy Mancunian skies that day. The same pairing notched up 55 at Chittagong as well - and sadly these are the only two half-century partnerships stitched together by Kiwi openers in 24 months of Test cricket.

NZ opening pairings: average partnership scores (Dec 07-Dec 09)

6. Flynn & Guptill (1.00)

5. Bell & Cumming (6.66)

4. Guptill & McIntosh (15.75)

3. How & McIntosh (17.50)

2. How & Bell (19.33)

1. How & Redmond (26.64)

Perhaps. Watling is a sliver ahead of Fulton in the Plunket Shield batting averages so far this season, but at least 100 of those runs came in the form of gift-wrapped long hops and full tosses (beautifully described by Allen McLaughlin as "pies, really") as Auckland's attack comprising wicketkeeper Reece Young (5 overs for 65) and batsman Anaru Kitchen (9 overs for 85) fed the ND batsmen a score to chase down. Of course, in his defence, it is also worth remembering that Watling's overall first-class record is more solid than Guptill's: 2155 runs at 30.35 vs 1338 at 27.30.

Let's make the assumption that Watling must play. Any other scenario would be ridiculous. That will allow Guptill to drop down in the order at least (although a strong case could be made for Ross Taylor to go up one to number three) so you'd end up with a top six along the lines of McIntosh (playing his Get Out of Jail Free card), Watling, Guptill (ditto), Taylor, Flynn and McCullum.

McIntosh is a genuine opener, but Guptill is a manufactured one. I did laugh in the second innings at the Basin when he did a light-hearted fist-pump when he got off the mark with a single and was not dismissed in the first over. It was funny - but it is probably also a damn good indication that "successful Test opener" is not written in his stars.

>> Follow the Beige Brigade on Twitter here: http://twitter.com/BeigeBrigade

>> Check out The Anne Frank Episode #105 of The BYC Podcast at beigebrigade.co.nz/loop/byc

>> Beige yourself up here

64 comments
Post a comment
Scott   #1   10:38 am Dec 08 2009

Not to sure if you read all the comments in the last post Holden but I agree with Taylor moving up to 3.

Watling, McIntosh, Taylor, Flynn, Guptil, McCullum, Elliot, Vettori would be my ideal line up.

but lets hope we draw at napier, its a draw ground, the only way we could lose is if our batting collapses. But as Vettori said, if you couldnt score runs on the Wellington deck...

Economist   #2   10:46 am Dec 08 2009

I just realised why McIntosh hasn't been dropped - he needs to score a half-century first. As Bell and Redmond have shown, getting 50 on the board after a run of low scores is a surefire way to convince the selectors that you're not up to the job.

liam   #3   11:04 am Dec 08 2009

Suprise suprise the player that appears in the top 3 average opening partnerships is not even in the squad.

Frank Rizzo   #4   11:40 am Dec 08 2009

I'm not sure about the pre-occupation with 'grittiness' from some of the NZ media.

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=10613693

From what I've seen from the NZ batsmen 'grittiness' just means "I'm struggling badly to score runs and I'm going to get out without getting past 30". Players like McIntosh, Flynn & Elliot have battled away without going anywhere. It's OK to battle for a while during a good spell of bowling or on a tough pitch but the above three just seem to do this whatever the situation and never emerge from the battling spell. All this ends up doing is giving the bowler the encouragement that you're never going to get on top of him and he can pretty much do what he wants. As a batsman you need more than a simple desire to stay at the crease. You need a game plan, to know your scoring areas and you have to cash in when the bowler strays into those areas. Flynn's main scoring area is of particular worry as he whips the ball from his pads through or behind square. Fine if the ball is angling down leg but very dangerous otherwise. LBW anyone?

Napier should give the batters a bit more leeway, there probably won't be as much seam movement for Asif so hopefully he won't be able to exert the suffocating pressure he did in Wellington.

Scott - I don't reckon Elliot will play, Patel will be in for him

straw   #5   12:46 pm Dec 08 2009

Great to see a new blog Holden - especially when their are plenty of talking points. Nothing like a good old-fashioned NZ batting collapse post-mortem to bring the armchair commentators (like me) out of the woodwork.

Frank - "From what I've seen from the NZ batsmen 'grittiness' just means "I'm struggling badly to score runs and I'm going to get out without getting past 30"."

Couldn't agree more. I think Flynn has been trying to show a little more 'positivity' in scoring singles but it clearly hasn't worked out so far. For the third test I see it's confirmed that Guptill will bat 3 and most likely only one of Flynn or Elliott at 5, so I'm assuming Vettori at 6 and Patel at 8.

Also, anyone know the latest on Redmond's fitness? Or Franklin's for that matter?

Jez   #6   01:01 pm Dec 08 2009

I think Guptill's fist pump was refreshingly honest. He wasn't trying to pretend that everything was fine, he was just trying to do his best.

I get very tired of the homogenized front put forward by the players. So carefully managed to the point they have no personality.

Lets face it, in this country, if you do anything out of the ordinary, someones going to have a go at you. I think the kiwi batsmen could benefit from being allowed to be themselves, to tell the rest of the world to go hang and let their performances speak for themselves.

Not one of them is truly relaxed. They pretend to be, but why maintain such a facade?

We have good batsmen. McIntosh, Flynn, Guptill, Elliott are all good batsmen, but their confidence is shot. And confidence is the biggest single defining factor in the NZ game.

I do not envy the situation NZ cricket players find themselves in. They train their whole lives to make the grade. Comprimise many other aspects of their lives. Then only get a handful of chances to prove themselves. That's very very tough. If you lose your spot, you lose your livelihood.

NZ Cricket has to stop looking at the national side and realise they need to manage the local game better. People need to be able to make a career out of playing domestic cricket if we are ever able to lift the game in NZ.

We need a ground up solution, not a top down one.

I think there are 3 major changes that need to happen. 1 - Domestic players need to be paid more. 2 - More international players should be allowed to play in NZ. 3 - More games need to be televised.

I realise these are very tough goals to shoot for, but without a major overhaul of the way we approach cricket in NZ, things will only get worse, not better. Everyone seems to be holding on for a miracle rather than taking stock properly.

Unwell   #7   01:51 pm Dec 08 2009

Can't say I think selection is the problem, it's just that there's no sure fire candidates available. Therefore we end up with the 'have a punt' selection. Even though I agree with BJ Watling's selection (we had to do something) I think this is more of the same and I don't have a lot of confidence that he will be a success. Problem is I don't have much confidence in any other option either. It's really 'hope and see' stuff.

ivor bigun   #8   02:15 pm Dec 08 2009

Predictions for Napier:

McIntosh will come out all guns blazing against Asif and Aamer getting into the 80s before holing out on the midwicket boundary. He will then be dropped for the Bangladesh series replaced by Redmond in a cruel twist of irony.

O'Brien will purposefully dislocate his finger on the 4th day of the test in a desperate attempt to 'break' a partnership between Yousuf and Umar Akmal.

Jeetan Patel will bowl really nicely but not take many wickets. Someone will hit him on to the roof of the stand.

Umar Akmal will score some runs, Daniel Vettori will rescue NZ.

Someone (not Peter Fulton) will ask for a referral on a run out that has already been to the third umpire.

Ian Smith will crap on about how great Hawke's Bay is.

BJ Watling will score 19 in one of the innings

T   #9   03:01 pm Dec 08 2009

Guptill and Mackintosh, Cumming and Bell, Blair Squared (Hartland and Pocock).... we don't need a new opener, we need an exorcist. Guptill is a number 3, but there's no point putting him there if our openers, to quote Navjot Sidhu, have a bat lift similar to an octopus falling out of a tree. Our technique to bowlers swinging it in is just shocking. John Wright's helping out with coaching isn't he? We could do worse than putting him out on the paddock. PS Good luck Watling. I'm cheering for you, although my throat is quite hoarse from cheering for How, Redmond, Cumming, Bell, Papps, Nevin, Jones, and others who have tried out the Black Caps poisoned chalice in any form of the game.

guy   #10   04:50 pm Dec 08 2009

on the "batting"... watling to fail. mcintoss, gulptil and fyllin to all bomb out again. taylor will do what taylor does. mccullem will throw the bat for another golden in the 1st, and be dropped 3 times on the way to 24 in the 2nd. dan the man will rock out another 40* and an unbeaten century in team totals of 197 and 243. sun is shining, weather is sweet yeah, make ya wanna move, ya dancing feet yeah.


Show 11-60 of 64 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content