Guest post: The Economist's T20 Team of the Decade

Last updated 11:46 05/01/2010

The Economist, a calculator- and Excel-toting regular viewer and commenter on Sideline Slogger, has taken on the onerous task of selecting his New Zealand teams of the decade from 2000-2009. We'll build up to the Test XI later in the week, but here is his first effort, zeroing in on the least loved format for any genuine cricket tragic: Twenty20. Note that he starts with a default XI then tweaks based on his own subjective assessment of the players and the overall team. 

Given that the only thing in NZ we'll be subjected to is some T20 dross masquerading as cricket, here are my NZ teams of the 2000s across all three formats (ignoring the fact that technically the decade doesn't end for another year - I read a great quote the other day where someone pointed out you'd never say that 1990 was part of the 1980s!). 

As some background, my starting point in selecting each team is to look at sheer quantity of contribution - runs, wickets, and catches/stumpings.  For the T20 team, the starting point is five run-scorers and five wicket-takers (and a keeper of course), then adding run-scorers before wicket-takers if extra players are necessary to reach eleven. Twelfth man is the guy to have played the most matches without making the XI.

The default T20 XI is (showing strike rates and RPOs rather than averages):

Jesse Ryder (231 runs @ strike rate of 133, 2 wickets @ 6.8 runs per over)

Brendon McCullum (831 runs @ S/R 124)

Martin Guptill (239 runs @ S/R 121)

Ross Taylor (468 runs @ S/R 122)

Scott Styris (400 runs @ S/R 116, 8 wickets @ 7.8 RPO)

Jacob Oram (377 runs @ S/R 142, 7 wickets @ 8.9 RPO)

Daniel Vettori, captain (67 runs @ 106, 27 wickets @ 5.5 RPO)

Kyle Mills (117 runs @ S/R 123, 16 wickets @ 8.7 RPO)

Shane Bond (20 runs @ S/R 100, 17 wickets @ 6.7 RPO)

Ian Butler (4 runs @ S/R 44, 16 wickets @ 8.3 RPO)

Jeetan Patel (3 runs @ S/R 64, 16 wickets @ RPO 8.1)

12th: Nathan McCullum

Other BATTING contenders: Craig McMillan was a success story in T20, with his average of 31 for the decade bettered only by Redmond and Brendon McCullum, and his strike rate of 160 beaten only by Redmond and TuffeyLou Vincent's average of 19 and S/R of 100 are not worth further consideration.  Peter Fulton's average of 12 and S/R of 93 are embarrassing (even Mills is better on both counts), while Stephen Fleming's average of 22 and SR of 129 are respectable. 

I've mentioned Aaron Redmond above - average 34 and S/R of 177 - but his figures need to be footnoted due to the fact most of his runs came against Ireland.  Exclude that innings and he's averaging 19@141.

Other BOWLING contenders: Tim Southee's average of 28 and RPO of 8.6 don't compare favourably.  Mark Gillespie averages 26 and has a reasonable RPO of 7.3.  Nathan McCullum has surprisingly good figures with an average of 18 and RPO of 6.5, while Chris Martin (28@8.4) and Iain O'Brien (19@8.9) are too expensive to make the cut.  Nathan Astle's average of 13 is outstanding and with an RPO of 7.3 he deserves consideration, although he bowled fewer than seven overs in the four matches he played and probably can't be seriously considered as a frontline bowler.

There are no other WICKETKEEPERS to mention.

Styris's figures are the weakest of the batsmen, and given that there are plenty of bowling options I'd bring McMillan into the team instead.  Despite his ordinary bowling figures, Oram deserves his place in the side as a batsman alone, so of the bowlers, Mills's spot looks to be the most under threat.  I'd bring in Nathan McCullum for him - three spinners may be a bit excessive but the stats show that spinners can be hard to get away.  With Bond, Butler, and Oram in the side, there are still three genuine pace bowlers.  Redmond (possibly for Taylor) and Astle (as a bowler - maybe for Butler) wouldn't let the side down but haven't really played enough to make it into the team.

THE ECONOMIST's Twenty20 NZ Team of the Noughties: Ryder, B McCullum, Guptill, Taylor, McMillan, Oram, Butler, N McCullum, Vettori (c), Bond, Patel. 12th: Styris.

Follow NZStuffBlogs on Twitter and get fast updates on all Stuff's blogs.

23 comments
Post a comment
Dr Zoidberg   #1   02:53 pm Jan 05 2010

Very hard to argue with that team Econ. Agree McMillian would be a middle order option and I have always been a Vincent fan. I'm guessing Cairnsie retired a bit early to be a contender, but if you could include Max cricket, he'd be a handy inclusion.

Jacob   #2   03:44 pm Jan 05 2010

Ugh. Even make-believe 20/20 XIs are boring. "Who can hit the ball really hard like?". "Who can bowl yorkers and slower balls?". There's your team.

Every time you make a game shorter you lose a dimension. For example, today I was able to (during a period of work-avoidance) make a test XI of "Immovable 21st Century Objects" (Richardson, Dravid, Chanderpaul, Kallis, Tillakaratne, Collingwood, Giles, Streak, Gillespie, Hoggard in case anyone cared at all).

Now you can't waste time with such quality about 20/20 can you? I guess maybe an "Off-the-Mark First Ball" XI might be fun. But nothing creates such joy in young and old alike as a nice 20-30 ball vigil while the batsmen 'gets a feel' for the pitch before edging one between 1st and 2nd slip for that cherished first run.

Dr Zoidberg   #3   04:58 pm Jan 05 2010

I've always enjoyed the "least deserving XIs", ie the guys who got an international cap where by rights they were lucky to be playing domestic cricket. Royden Hayes always leaps to mind. As does Greg "He's a legspinner....quick select him" Loveridge. But then again he blew to bits on the boundary without ever bowling a ball so it's a bit harsh to include him.

Strangely, Chris Martin is starting to resemble Roydon in appearance.

That is all.

Economist   #4   05:13 pm Jan 05 2010

Dr Z: Cairns bowling was economical enough at 6.5/over, but ironically his batting was a major albatross around his teammates' necks: he managed just 3 runs from 13 balls in his two matches. Don't have stats readily available for Max I'm afraid, but I'm sure if he'd played more matches and taken them more seriously his record would have been better.

Jacob: note this quote from the top of the post about my T20 sentiments: "T20 dross masquerading as cricket". I've only compiled this team out of a sense of duty for completeness.

Scott   #5   09:44 am Jan 06 2010

very hard to argue with that team, definitely have the three spinners and it bats allll the way down to 10.

Only thing I probably would of disagreed with would be the part of saying Redmond (possibly for Taylor). I would rather Taylor than Guptill. but then again would prefer Guptill than Redmond ;)

Jacob   #6   10:53 am Jan 06 2010

Indeed you did Sir Economy. I can almost sense the pinched nose and look of mild disgust as you began the blog.

Another excellent time waster would be the "Totally Unsuitable for 20/20 XI". One can only wistfully imagine the immaculate forward defence that the opening combination of Sir Boycott and Sunil Gavaskar would produce. Bowlers would spend 17 bemused overs trying every combination of yorker, slower ball, bouncer, slow yorker, slow bounder, slower slower ball, and bouncing yorker to remove them, until Boycott purposefully runs out Gavaskar for 7 for scoring too quickly. But never fear! Mark Richardson will stride out manfully at number three to ensure that there is no panic.

Reg Corres   #7   06:08 am Jan 07 2010

I guess the fact we only have five years of numbers makes this one a bit more of a lottery than the proper forms of cricket. I am quite amazed by two things; firstly some of the names that have played for us i.e. Jeff Wilson, Paul Hitchcock and Ewen Thompson and secondly Skippy has played twice for us and has 0 runs from 5 balls.

Fat Sally   #8   12:10 pm Jan 07 2010

Dr Z - Greg Loveridge actually broke his finger stopping a firmly struck shot hit back at him. He is now very high up in Robert Jones Investments and earning loats of money. Maybe he could be captain of the "Financially Secure XI" He could bowl in tandem with the Wellington bowler who ended up working on Wall St

Economist   #9   01:14 pm Jan 07 2010

Re Loveridge - he was in fact hit on the hand while batting. A great quote from his Cricinfo profile: "He didn't get a chance [to play test cricket] again, which might seem harsh, but not if you look at his first-class record."

Ben A.   #10   06:12 pm Jan 08 2010

Hope everyone's had a good Christmas and New Year...good to see the anorakism continues here even in the bizarre absence of any international cricket in this country in the middle of the summer.

HJust came across the statistical gem in an article on Cricinfo that looking at batsmen who have made 1500 runs and over in tests in the last three years, in this period Vettori has out-averaged Ricky Ponting (Ross Taylor has too). Brilliant.


Show 11-23 of 23 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content