Jeetan Patel pivotal in county final qualifier win

Last updated 10:01 05/09/2014
Jeetan Patel
Getty Images
IN CONTROL: Jeetan Patel in action for Warwickshire.

Relevant offers

Cricket

Central Hinds and Canterbury Magicians to square off in T20 final Wellington Firebirds beat Otago Volts to climb to the top of Plunket Shield Rival fans bask in the banter as Black Caps and Australia clash in Hamilton Aussies give Brendon McCullum guard of honour for last game Northern Knights grab first Plunket Shield win of the season v Central Stags Aaron Finch axed as Australia's Twenty20 captain Strategy to bore Kane Williamson working a treat for Australia Mitchell Santner ruled out of Chappell-Hadlee decider with foot injury - Five talking points of the Chappell-Hadlee Trophy decider in Hamilton ICC suspends Pakistan leg spinner Yasir Shah for three months for positive test

New Zealand off-spinner Jeetan Patel played a central role as his Warwickshire side qualified for the 50-overs final in English country cricket.

Warwickshire beat Kent by six wickets with 21 balls remaining in a lop-sided semifinal in Birmingham today.

They would play the winner of Sunday's second semifinal between Durham and Nottinghamshire.

The final was set down for Lord's on September 20 and gave Warwickshire the chance of a county white-ball double after snaring the Twenty20 honours.

Kent won the toss and opted to bat, but managed just 215-8 off their 50 overs.

Patel, with wickets and economy, was central to strangling the Kent batting effort.

He took 2-38 in his 10 overs.

Patel was not required to bat as Warwickshire knocked off the runs for the loss of four wickets, thanks to half-centuries by Jonathan Trott, Varun Chopra and Tim Ambrose.

Patel has taken 19 wickets in nine matches to have the second-best haul in the one-day competition.

He has best figures of 4-24 and has got his wickets at an average of 9.26 while bowling with an economy rate of 4.57.

Ad Feedback

- Stuff

Special offers
Opinion poll

Should bouncers be banned from cricket?

Yes - they're too dangerous

Neutral - it is what it is

No - it's just bad luck when it goes wrong

Vote Result

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content