ICC has no plans to stand down Bucknor

Last updated 00:00 01/01/2009

Relevant offers

Cricket

Eight-wicket haul sees Neil Wagner climb to top of English county bowling charts Zimbabwe axe coach and captain days before India arrive for limited overs tour Sri Lanka paceman Shaminda Eranga reported over bowling action in England test Kane Williamson and Martin Guptill named players of the year at cricket awards The bargain buys and big-money flops of IPL 2016 Alastair Cook milestone as England win to clinch Sri Lanka series Alastair Cook becomes first Englishman to hit 10,000 test runs Adam Zampa wants to impress selectors on his own merit Kane Williamson carries the drinks as David Warner blasts Sunrisers Hyderabad to IPL title Sri Lanka's Mathews leads from front to frustrate England in second test

The International Cricket Council (ICC) has said it had no plans to adhere to India's demand and remove umpire Steve Bucknor from the third test against Australia.

The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) has demanded Bucknor be stood down from the Test at the WACA Ground, which starts on January 16, following the poor performances of the Jamaican and England's Mark Benson during the second test at the SCG.

India were angered by several key decisions during the test, and insisted afterwards the result – a 122-run win to Australia – would have been different had half the incorrect decisions gone the tourists' way.

Benson is not scheduled to stand in the third test, but Bucknor is, with Pakistan's Asad Rauf.

However an ICC spokesman last night said cricket's governing body had no plans to change officials.

"We have not received anything from the BCCI at this point in time," the spokesman said.

"We have no plans to change the appointments."

India have called for Bucknor to be replaced despite it contradicting the laws of test cricket, which state teams do not have a say on which umpires officiate matches.

Ad Feedback

- AAP

Special offers
Opinion poll

Should bouncers be banned from cricket?

Yes - they're too dangerous

Neutral - it is what it is

No - it's just bad luck when it goes wrong

Vote Result

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content