ICC has no plans to stand down Bucknor

Last updated 00:00 01/01/2009

Relevant offers

Cricket

Pat Cummins' comeback gets Lillee's approval Flight of the Colins ready for takeoff for Black Caps on Australian runways Northern Spirit score another upset women's cricket win in Twenty20 competition Shane Watson injured as Sydney Thunder lose to Canterbury Kings Strangers in their neighbours' backyard: Black Caps tiptoe onto mystical SCG Coach Darren Lehmann steps in as Glenn Maxwell takes aim at Australia team-mate Matthew Wade George Worker returns from crook elbow to strengthen CD batting lineup Northern Knights start Super Smash Twenty20 campaign without Black Caps Black Caps all-rounder Mitchell Santner signs on for return to English county side Worcester Chappell-Hadlee Trophy: Five memorable moments in trans-Tasman matches

The International Cricket Council (ICC) has said it had no plans to adhere to India's demand and remove umpire Steve Bucknor from the third test against Australia.

The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) has demanded Bucknor be stood down from the Test at the WACA Ground, which starts on January 16, following the poor performances of the Jamaican and England's Mark Benson during the second test at the SCG.

India were angered by several key decisions during the test, and insisted afterwards the result – a 122-run win to Australia – would have been different had half the incorrect decisions gone the tourists' way.

Benson is not scheduled to stand in the third test, but Bucknor is, with Pakistan's Asad Rauf.

However an ICC spokesman last night said cricket's governing body had no plans to change officials.

"We have not received anything from the BCCI at this point in time," the spokesman said.

"We have no plans to change the appointments."

India have called for Bucknor to be replaced despite it contradicting the laws of test cricket, which state teams do not have a say on which umpires officiate matches.

Ad Feedback

- AAP

Special offers
Opinion poll

Should bouncers be banned from cricket?

Yes - they're too dangerous

Neutral - it is what it is

No - it's just bad luck when it goes wrong

Vote Result

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content