New Zealand U-19s suffer first World Cup loss

Last updated 18:55 16/08/2012

Relevant offers

Cricket

England and India draw the first test Sri Lanka's Senanayake banned for suspect action South Africa seal ODI series win in Sri Lanka Draw looms as records tumble at Trent Bridge Root, Anderson provide resistance afer collapse Doug Bracewell thrown lifeline by NZ Cricket We could be seeing Vettori very soon indeed Vijay falls, India build solid first test platform Adam Milne makes NZ Cricket cut after surgery Differing fortunes for Matt Henry, Peter Fulton

New Zealand's unbeaten run at cricket's under-19 World Cup came to a predictable end today as Pakistan topped pool B with by cruising to five-wicket win on Queensland's Sunshine Coast.

The signs were ominous after New Zealand recorded unconvincing victories over Scotland and Afghanistan and their first encounter with quality opposition indicated the title should be beyond them although they do advance to the quarterfinals.

Opting to bat first at John Blanck Oval in Buderim, New Zealand crawled to 152-8 from their 50 overs - a required run rate of 3.06 was never going to tax the Pakistanis and they loped to the target with more than 18 overs to spare.

Henry Walsh top scored with 33 from 61 deliveries while Robert O'Donnell (29) and Joe Carter (21) also made starts among the specialist batsmen.

Pacemen Zia-ul-Haq (2-27) and Ehsan Adil (2-21) kept runs at a premium during their 10 over allocation while each of the five bowlers employed were rewarded with wickets.

Pakistan might have been in bother at 57-3 in the 14th over but Imam-ul-Haq (40) and Saad Ali (32) steadied the chase before Mohammad Nawaz's brace of sixes and Salman Afridi's 18 from 15 balls guaranteed an early finish as the duo carried the score to 153-5 in the 32nd over.

Ad Feedback

- Fairfax Media

Special offers
Opinion poll

Was a life ban from cricket a fair punishment for Lou Vincent?

Yes, he's admitted to match-fixing and deserves his punishment

It doesn't go far enough in my opinion

No, it's only going to deter whistle blowers in the future

It's too harsh. A two-year ban would have been fair

Vote Result

Related story: (See story)

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content