Auckland fight back after Canterbury post 405

Last updated 18:33 17/12/2012

Relevant offers

Cricket

Kane Williamson and David Warner star in a cringeworthy TV ad England on course to crush Sri Lanka in second test Trent Boult helps Hyderabad make IPL final over Brendon McCullum's Gujarat England batsmen fail to punish Sri Lanka as untidy Cook misses out on 10,000 Basin Reserve risks becoming 'tier two' venue unless work hastens, says councillor Hagley Oval gets 25 days of international cricket over next two summers Cricketer Anton Devcich rocks the Steven Adams moustache Black Caps returning to Nelson's Saxton Oval to take on Bangladesh Eden Park set to host day-night cricket test against England in 2018 Australia cricketers embrace guided missile technology in Ashes quest

A unbeaten 127-run eighth wicket partnership by Auckland has stopped Canterbrury running away with their Plunket Shield Cricket match in Auckland today.

At stumps on day two, the Aces are 267-7, still 141 behind the Wizards' first innings total.

After Canterbury's English import Gareth Andrew scored 180 - his maiden first-class century -  Canterbury declared at 405-9.

Auckland struggled early as Andrew removed both Lou Vincent and Reece Young and at 5-58 were in all sorts of trouble.

Aces skipper Gareth Hopkins then added 76 with Auckland's own English import Phil Mustard (55), but when Mustard and Bruce Martin departed in quick succession, Auckland were still 268 behind Canterbury with only three wickets in hand.

But Hopkins carried on and reached stumps just four shy of his 15th first-class hundred. He and Kyle Mills have put on 127 for the eighth wicket and the Aces will resume tomorrow 141 behind, but in a far better position than they could have been.

Left-armer Ryan McCone is the best of the Canterbury bowlers taking 4-47.

Andrew and Canterbury No 10 Willie Lonsdale (20) had earlier added 97 for the ninth wicket for the Wizards before Tom Latham declared.

Ad Feedback

- Fairfax Media

Special offers
Opinion poll

Should bouncers be banned from cricket?

Yes - they're too dangerous

Neutral - it is what it is

No - it's just bad luck when it goes wrong

Vote Result

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content