Otago-CD clash meanders to a draw

LOGAN SAVORY
Last updated 16:39 20/12/2012

Relevant offers

Cricket

New Zealand Cricket names domestic contracts Sri Lanka spinners strike early double blow Oram, Bell join White Ferns coaching staff Zimbabwe wield axe after Afghanistan draw Stead: Canterbury cricket contracts mostly local Cricket bosses turn down Games invite Jayawardene hits ton to help Sri Lanka recovery Batsman Craig Cachopa signs deal with Sussex Kane Williamson banned over bowling action New Zealand's top female cricketers to be paid

The final day of the Otago-Central Districts Plunket Shield fixture crawled to a draw today as Otago had few problems fighting any slim hope Central Districts had of running through them this morning.

Otago began play today 37 for one and only a flurry of wickets this morning would have put them in doubt of losing this fixture outright.

Night-watchman Neil Wagner improved his credentials as a useful batsman when he dug his heels in scoring 68 in a 157-ball stay, while Dutch international Ryan ten Doeschate backed up his first innings hundred with an unbeaten 54 in what was his 100th first-class match.

With the game meandering at the tea break it was decided to call time on proceedings and accept the match would be drawn.

First innings points firms up Central Districts place at the top of the table and they can thank veteran Mathew Sinclair's 36th first-class century for doing so.

His knock of 142 was the key factor in Central Districts passing Otago's first innings total of 427.

Both teams will take a break from first class through to January 24.

The focus will now switch solely to the Twenty20 format which will be played through to January 20.

The Volts next fixture will be against Wellington in Dunedin starting at 2pm on Sunday.

For Central Districts they will play Wellington in Wellington on Boxing Day.

Ad Feedback

- Fairfax Media

Special offers
Opinion poll

Was a life ban from cricket a fair punishment for Lou Vincent?

Yes, he's admitted to match-fixing and deserves his punishment

It doesn't go far enough in my opinion

No, it's only going to deter whistle blowers in the future

It's too harsh. A two-year ban would have been fair

Vote Result

Related story: (See story)

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content