CD edge closer to title with Canterbury win

MATT RICHENS
Last updated 12:43 17/02/2013
Mathew Sinclair
Photosport
GAME CHANGER: Mathew Sinclair scored his 68th first class half century to guide CD past Canterbury.

Relevant offers

Cricket

No deal in sight as Australian cricket pay dispute hits crisis point Newcomer Dawid Malan leads England to T20 series win vs South Africa Suzie Bates and Holly Huddleston lead White Ferns to first-up World Cup win Cricket Australia issues revised pay offer to players in bid to break impasse White Ferns can be giantkillers in biggest Women's World Cup yet: 'I still think we can go under the radar' Doug Bracewell loses NZ Cricket contract as Raval, Broom, de Grandhomme elevated to top-21 NZC contracts up for grabs as Black Caps Luke Ronchi and Jeetan Patel retire Afghanistan, Ireland granted test cricket status Afghanistan, Ireland awarded test status in cricket India arrest 19 for celebrating Pakistan's Champions Trophy sparking calls for their immediate release

Central Districts have strengthened their grip on Cricket's Plunket Shield with a four wicket win over Canterbury.

The Stags, chasing 259 for victory on the final day at Rangiora reached the target before lunch to stay on top of the six-team competition with just one round remaining.

Probable wins to the Stags' main rivals, Northern Districts and Otago, mean the competition should go down to the final round, starting on Wednesday.

After reaching 145-0 in their chase last night, CD's bid for their sixth outright win of the season looked a fait accompli, but three late wickets last night kept Canterbury interested.

They removed nightwatchman Ajaz Patel early this morning then skipper Kieran Noema-Barnett with more than 50 needed.

But, as he has done numerous time, Mathew Sinclair did the hard work and all but saw CD to the finish.

He was out with just four required, but not before registering his 68th first class half century.

Ad Feedback

- Stuff

Special offers
Opinion poll

Should bouncers be banned from cricket?

Yes - they're too dangerous

Neutral - it is what it is

No - it's just bad luck when it goes wrong

Vote Result

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content