CD edge closer to title with Canterbury win

Last updated 12:43 17/02/2013
Mathew Sinclair
GAME CHANGER: Mathew Sinclair scored his 68th first class half century to guide CD past Canterbury.

Relevant offers


Plunket Shield 2016-17: An XI of players who will be pressing test selection claims Hamish Marshall excited about final chapter of cricket career in Wellington Wellington seek strong start to Plunket Shield after impressive preseason Henry Nicholls 'disappointed' not to be in India with Black Caps but targets 'big runs' in Plunket Shield Indian media praise Kane Williamson and his Black Caps as series finally gets competitive Skipper hails 'special performance' from Trent Boult in series-levelling victory What return is NZ Cricket getting on its $5m investment in domestic cricket? Six players who could crack the Black Caps: our full domestic cricket preview Kane Williamson century leads Black Caps to victory in Indian thriller Recap: Black Caps v India - second ODI in Delhi

Central Districts have strengthened their grip on Cricket's Plunket Shield with a four wicket win over Canterbury.

The Stags, chasing 259 for victory on the final day at Rangiora reached the target before lunch to stay on top of the six-team competition with just one round remaining.

Probable wins to the Stags' main rivals, Northern Districts and Otago, mean the competition should go down to the final round, starting on Wednesday.

After reaching 145-0 in their chase last night, CD's bid for their sixth outright win of the season looked a fait accompli, but three late wickets last night kept Canterbury interested.

They removed nightwatchman Ajaz Patel early this morning then skipper Kieran Noema-Barnett with more than 50 needed.

But, as he has done numerous time, Mathew Sinclair did the hard work and all but saw CD to the finish.

He was out with just four required, but not before registering his 68th first class half century.

Ad Feedback

- Stuff

Special offers
Opinion poll

Should bouncers be banned from cricket?

Yes - they're too dangerous

Neutral - it is what it is

No - it's just bad luck when it goes wrong

Vote Result

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content