Canterbury thrash Auckland in Plunket Shield

MATT RICHENS
Last updated 13:01 22/02/2013
Ryan McCone
CHRIS HILLOCK/Fairfax NZ
TOP EFFORT: Ryan McCone led the Canterbury bowlers with 3-33.

Relevant offers

Cricket

Umpire Bruce Oxenford tries out protective equipment during England v Sri Lanka ODI Jason Roy smashes 162 to steer England to an ODI victory over Sri Lanka Ryan McCone keen to add his experience to CD bowling lineup Black Caps day-night test in India all-but off table as tour schedule confirmed by BCCI Test venue switch for Black Caps tour of India, first test now in Kanpur Paceman Ryan McCone adds more depth to CD bowling stocks Three new Otago Volts players contracted for 2016/17 season Zak Gibson and Josef Walker receive Northern Districts contracts for this summer Chris Cairns seeking damages from MCC for YouTube blunder Can Pakistan's Mohammad Amir be the world's best bowler, in spite of past fixing?

Canterbury have wrapped up their final Plunket Shield cricket match of the season with a nine wicket thrashing of Auckland today.

The four day match barely went into day three at Christchurch's Hagley Oval as both Auckland's innings were poor.

Rolled for 173 on day one, Auckland were dismissed this morning for just 170, leaving Canterbury only 42 to pick up their third outright win of the season.

Gareth Hopkins was Auckland's best scoring an unbeaten 66 batting at No 5 before he ran out of partners.

Ryan McCone (3-33) and Matt McEwan (3-63) were Canterbury's best with the ball while Ben McCord grabbed two wickets and Shanan Stewart and Todd Astle had one apiece.

Canterbury skipper Peter Fulton (19no) and Henry Nicholls (7no) knocked off the winning runs well before lunch.

Canterbury's chase lasted just seven overs.

The loss secured Auckland the competition's wooden spoon while Canterbury's outright win, just their third of the season, is likely to move them up to fourth on the six-team ladder.

Ad Feedback

- Stuff

Special offers
Opinion poll

Should bouncers be banned from cricket?

Yes - they're too dangerous

Neutral - it is what it is

No - it's just bad luck when it goes wrong

Vote Result

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content