Hamish Rutherford set for test call-up

Last updated 05:00 23/02/2013
Hamish Rutherford
Fairfax NZ
HAMISH RUTHERFORD: Will likely make his test debut against England.

Relevant offers


Brendon McCullum, Jesse Ryder propel their English sides to Twenty20 victories NZ Cricket block Tim Southee temporary deal with English county side Northants Black Caps bowler Mitchell McClenaghan injures pelvis playing in English T20 league Black Caps allrounder Grant Elliott lands Caribbean Premier League deal Anil Kumble named as Indian coach in bold selection Case of mistaken identity almost had Ross Taylor talking football on Sky Sports UK Australians march into ODI tri-series final with Windies victory Liam Plunkett hits last-ball six as England tie with Sri Lanka Disgraced Pakistan bowler Mohammad Asif returns to cricket with Norway club side India thumps Zimbabwe by 10 wickets to level T20 series

A dream week just keeps getting better for Hamish Rutherford, who's likely to be summoned tomorrow for his test debut against England.

The Otago left-hander was recalled for the second and third ODIs in place of the injured Martin Guptill, and the latter's impending thumb surgery has opened the door to the test side, too.

Rutherford and Peter Fulton, the in-form Canterbury batsman, are poised to form New Zealand's latest test opening duo, because of Guptill's series-ending thumb problem and captain Brendon McCullum's shift to No 5.

The skipper dropped a hint yesterday, confirming Guptill's injury wouldn't force a reshuffle and he and gloveman BJ Watling would both bat in the middle order. It appeared a good time to promote Watling, who played South Africa's pace the best of anyone, and summon Wellington's in-form Luke Ronchi to take the gloves, but that won't happen for the first test in Dunedin, at least.

"Ultimately we're looking to try to shift the balance of our experience a little bit lower with the middle order. And BJ did really well in South Africa batting down the order too. He's a lot more successful batting down the order, averaging 60-odd, than batting at the top," McCullum said.

"With an eye to the future it may be an opportunity for a new guy to be tried at the top."

That new guy, Rutherford, appears to have headed off a few contenders, including occasional test openers Daniel Flynn and Aaron Redmond. The former has had a few chances while the latter has scored nearly 1000 Plunket Shield runs at 58.5 but still has questionmarks over his temperament.

Rutherford averaged 40.6 in Plunket Shield this summer and his last three bats were worth 90 against Wellington, and 162 and 28 against Northern Districts. It seems a shade too soon for the 23-year-old but he's highly rated and just needs to rein himself in outside off stump.

Fulton was the chosen one in South Africa before suffering a knee injury. An average of 20.93 from 10 tests, the most recent against Pakistan in 2009, isn't world-beating. But he has a key backer in assistant coach Bob Carter and averages over 55 in Plunket Shield after a timely 98 against Auckland this week.

Left-armer Bruce Martin could snare the spinner's berth, and a long-awaited test debut at 32.

Martin was unlucky not to play in South Africa and is regarded by domestic batsmen as the best spinner in the country.

Ad Feedback

Jeetan Patel hasn't done enough, while thoughts of handing Nathan McCullum a test debut seem to have faded.

Wellington's Mark Gillespie could sneak into the squad ahead of Neil Wagner for the final pace bowler's berth, and New Zealand could do a lot worse than consider playing four pacemen. Gillespie's efforts against South Africa a year ago were compelling and he'll get a bowl at England's batsmen in Queenstown next week.

Likely New Zealand test squad: Brendon McCullum (captain), Peter Fulton, Hamish Rutherford, Kane Williamson, Ross Taylor, Dean Brownlie, BJ Watling, James Franklin, Bruce Martin, Tim Southee, Doug Bracewell, Trent Boult, Mark Gillespie.

- The Dominion Post

Special offers
Opinion poll

Should bouncers be banned from cricket?

Yes - they're too dangerous

Neutral - it is what it is

No - it's just bad luck when it goes wrong

Vote Result

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content