Knights rip through visitors to force follow-on

IAN ANDERSON
Last updated 14:23 27/11/2013

Relevant offers

Cricket

Ian Bell century bolsters England in India test Batsman in trouble for 'Save Gaza' wristband World Cup minnows to tour New Zealand Kevin Pietersen signs for BBL's Melbourne Stars Jesse Ryder in smashing form with bat for Essex Cook, Ballance century put England in control Petersen dismissed in Proteas' steep run chase Timely Amla ton keeps Proteas in the running Scott Styris ponders Northern Knights future Diamanti gets chance to shine with Canterbury

The Central Stags were forced to follow-on in their Plunket Shield match against the Northern Knights this afternoon.

The outcome seemed highly unlikely when the hosts were dismissed for 287 shortly before stumps on day one yesterday.

But the Knights, spearheaded by Black Caps pace duo Trent Boult and Tim Southee, ripped through the visitors today for 89. 

With 150 behind being the follow-on mark, Knights captain Daniel Flynn instructed the umpires he fancied another crack at the shell-shocked Stags batsmen.

Boult cleaned up the tail to finish with the figures of 5-30 off 15.3 overs while Southee tormented the Stags top order to collect 4-39 off 16 overs.

Central resumed this morning at 4-2, having already lost two wickets to the first two balls of their innings from Southee last night.

After Boult removed nightwatchman Ben Wheeler in the third over of the day, Southee snared the prized wicket of fellow international teammate Ross Taylor, who got to 10 before edging Southee to Daniel Vettori at third slip.

He also picked up the wicket of opener Ben Smith soon after, before Boult trapped Peter Trego lbw.

Vettori, who bowled the first over of the day to allow the pacemen to switch ends, came on after drinks and got an immediate return by having Will Young lbw.

Kruger van Wyk - last out for 28 - proved the only form of minor resistance as Boult rattled through the lower order.

That gave the Knights five first innings points and the Stags four, with the host well-placed to chase an outright win should the weather hold over the remaining two and a half days.

Ad Feedback

- Fairfax Media

Special offers
Opinion poll

What do you make of the decision to ban Kane Williamson from bowling?

It seems harsh to me. I can't see a bend in his elbow.

It's fair. His action has been tested and found wanting.

There's no consistency in cricket. Remember a bloke called Muralitharan?

What? Kane Williamson isn't allowed to bowl?

Vote Result

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content