No Ashes sledging truce, says Mitchell Johnson

Last updated 07:41 28/11/2013
Mitchell Johnson
Getty Images
NICE ONE MATE: Mitchell Johnson celebrates dismissing Kevin Pietersen of England.

Relevant offers


Australia see off Sri Lanka in entertaining Oval warm-up Wellington Firebirds sign Michael Bracewell from Otago as family complete full set of first-class teams Corey Anderson, Adam Milne continue flood of New Zealand cricketers into England Twenty20 comp Speed and spin for Black Caps: Adam Milne poised for key role at Champions Trophy Kane Williamson vows Black Caps won't play conservative cricket in Champions Trophy Australian cricketers call in former government minister Greg Combet to guide them in pay dispute See you in two weeks: Bangladesh rock Black Caps but teams will be judged for real in Champions Trophy rematch Black Cap Doug Bracewell sentenced to community work for drink-driving Eoin Morgan century leads England to 72-run win over South Africa Australian captain Steve Smith hopeful of resolution to pay dispute

Australian pace ace Mitchell Johnson says England can forget about a sledging truce and has warned them to expect an even tougher time dealing with his bouncers in the second Ashes Test in Adelaide.

Johnson reckons England are shaken after copping a sledging barrage during Australia's 381-run win in Brisbane, in which the left-arm quick snared match figures of 9-103.

Australia are keen to employ similar tactics for the remainder of the series, although ICC chief executive David Richardson says match referee Jeff Crowe will to speak to both captains in an attempt to calm the fire.

"I think it's worked for us. I definitely think they're rattled by it," said Johnson in Perth on Wednesday.

"They don't like it at all.

"Obviously their coach has come out and wanted a truce from what I've heard.

"That's not going to change from our end."

Adelaide Oval is renowned as a batsman's paradise although the move to a drop-in pitch has added an element of mystery for the second Test starting on December 5.

But Johnson said England were kidding themselves if they thought they could escape another painful battering from the short ball.

"I'll still come in with the short ball because it is up and down in Adelaide, so it makes it even harder I think," Johnson said in Perth on Wednesday.

"At the Gabba, you know it's true bounce.

"But Adelaide is not true bounce.

"So I think that makes it a lot more difficult to play the short ball, and obviously reverse swing comes in to it as well.

"I don't like facing bouncers. No one does.

"When the ball's coming past your nose on a fast wicket, it's never nice.

"I'm not sure if it's fear (England's batsmen were experiencing), but I'll definitely continue to use it, because it definitely worked."

Australian skipper Michael Clarke was fined 20 per cent of his match fee after television viewers heard using an expletive while him telling England tail-ender James Anderson to prepare for a broken arm before a Johnson delivery.

That was after Anderson had allegedly threatened to punch George Bailey.

ICC boss Richardson has labelled abusive language on the field immature and unnecessary.

But Johnson was right to back his skipper.

"I thought it was really good what Michael did, as a captain. That's what you want your captain to do - stand up for the players, and that's what he did."

England all-rounder Ben Stokes is the front runner to replace Trott for the second Test in Adelaide.

Ad Feedback

The visitors will take on an Australian Chairman's XI in a two-day match in Alice Springs, starting Friday.

England all-rounder Stuart Broad said it was heartbreaking for the team to lose Trott.

"He's a fantastic guy," Broad said.

"He gave us a lot of solidity in the No.3 spot. But the important thing is he's got the support of the change room he's played with for 49 Tests.

"Everyone's looking out for him, and he gets a bit of privacy at home to get himself right. We wish him very well from Australia."


Special offers
Opinion poll

Should bouncers be banned from cricket?

Yes - they're too dangerous

Neutral - it is what it is

No - it's just bad luck when it goes wrong

Vote Result

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content