England's Ian Bell injured during nets session

GREG BUCKLE
Last updated 03:29 04/12/2013

Relevant offers

Cricket

Glenn Maxwell, Mitchell Johnson star as Aussies thrash England in Tri-Series final Three into five won't go for New Zealand pace quintet as World Cup prep gears up Andrew Mathieson has a field day as Central Stags win national one-day cricket final Michael Clarke denies Cricket Australia, team-mate rifts How high the question for Central Districts in final Clinical New Zealand chase down Pakistan total with ease to claim ODI win Black Caps sail to comfortable win over Pakistan England survive in Perth to reach tri-series final Bowlers on notice as New Zealand look to bounce back against Pakistan Former coach Warren Lees hopes Black Caps can go one better at World Cup

England's leading batsman Ian Bell has been struck on the shoulder at training and was forced to leave the Adelaide Oval nets for treatment.

Bell, who was player of the series in England's Ashes triumph in the UK in August 2013, was hit while facing throw-downs from batting coach Graham Gooch.

Bell does not appear to have suffered a serious injury and is likely to train on Wednesday on the eve of the second Test, according to a London Evening Standard report.

England are determined to improve their batting against the short-ball by facing a barrage of bouncers at training.

It follows their 381-run loss in last month's first Test in Brisbane where Australian quick Mitchell Johnson claimed nine wickets.

Following England No 3 Jonathan Trott's return home with a stress-related illness, Bell is vying with No 6 Joe Root for the vital first-drop role in Adelaide.

Both Bell and Root have said they're keen to do the job.

News of Bell's shoulder concern comes after Australia captain Michael Clarke didn't train on Tuesday because of a sore ankle.

An Australia team spokesman said Clarke, who scored a century in Brisbane, is in no doubt for Thursday's game.

Ad Feedback

- AAP

Special offers
Opinion poll

Should bouncers be banned from cricket?

Yes - they're too dangerous

Neutral - it is what it is

No - it's just bad luck when it goes wrong

Vote Result

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content