Otago, Central Districts clash ends in a draw

LOGAN SAVORY
Last updated 18:51 23/12/2013

Relevant offers

Cricket

Ravindra Jadeja fined for fracas with Anderson New Zealand Cricket names domestic contracts Hashim Amla, De Villiers dig in for South Africa Oram, Bell join White Ferns coaching staff Zimbabwe wield axe after Afghanistan draw Stead: Canterbury cricket contracts mostly local Cricket bosses turn down Games invite Jayawardene hits ton to help Sri Lanka recovery Scott Styris ponders Northern Knights future Diamanti gets chance to shine with Canterbury

The Otago Volts went ever so close to what would have been an exciting win on the final day of their four-day Plunket Shield game against Central Districts in Dunedin today.

The Volts began the day 371 for eight with a handy 116 run first innings lead over Central.

The tail pushed that out to a 127 run lead before they lost their final first innings wicket this morning.

It meant the Volts bowlers needed to make inroads into the Central batting lineup to put them in a position for victory.

When Central knocked off the deficit with the loss of three wickets a draw looked likely.

The talented Will Young was the rock in the Central batting lineup as the youngster fell agonisingly short of his second first-class century when Jimmy Neesham picked him up on 99.

Young's wicket was the start of a mini-collapse as the visitors went from 226 for six to 231 for nine in double quick time.

With Central having just the one wicket in handy and just a 104 run lead with close 20 overs remaining in the day the Volts smelt blood.

However Central's No 10 and No 11, Adam Milne and Ajaz Patel, proved stubborn and seen out 11 overs to effectively end the home team's hopes.

With eight overs remaining in the day the game was called off and they had to settle on a draw.

Ad Feedback

- Fairfax Media

Special offers
Opinion poll

Was a life ban from cricket a fair punishment for Lou Vincent?

Yes, he's admitted to match-fixing and deserves his punishment

It doesn't go far enough in my opinion

No, it's only going to deter whistle blowers in the future

It's too harsh. A two-year ban would have been fair

Vote Result

Related story: (See story)

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content