Kenya's cricket World Cup hopes take nosedive

AARON GOILE
Last updated 19:23 17/01/2014

Relevant offers

Cricket

From poor student to international cricketer: Lockie Ferguson's Melbourne merry go round Corey Anderson putting no time frame on return to bowling or Black Caps recall Players cool on Christmas Day BBL clash Black Caps v Australia: Chappell-Hadlee III - scorecard Black Caps v Australia: Chappell-Hadlee ODI III - ball-by-ball Jesse Ryder returns from injury to take place in Stags lineup against Knights Canterbury Kings determined to reduce extras against Auckland Aces Giant cricket bats a safety issue says Darren Lehmann as MCC cracks down Justin Langer to coach Australia in Twenty20 series Umpire Paul Reiffel felled by wayward throw in England-India cricket test

Kenya's hopes of qualifying for next year's World Cup have nosedived after suffering their second loss in as many games at the qualifying tournament in New Zealand.

The 2003 semifinalists yesterday went down to Namibia by two wickets at Mt Maunganui's Bay Oval.

Namibia are two from two after upsetting the Netherlands in their first fixture.

Having won the toss, Kenya found themselves in big trouble at 11-3 and never really recovered.

Veteran Steve Tikolo top scored with 47, while Rakep Patel (44), Morris Ouma (32) and Hiren Varaiya  (32) chipped in to help Kenya reach 186-8 in their 50 overs.

Namibia left-arm seamer JJ Smit finished with figures of 3-23 off 10 overs, including two maidens.

In reply, Namibia stuttered to 26-2 in the 10th over, but a patient 45 off 97 balls from No 3 Sarel Burger got his side close, before Smit's unbeaten 33 off 31 balls got them over the line with seven balls to spare.

Kenya 186-8 (S Tikolo 47, R Patel 44, M Ouma 32, H Varaiya 32; J Smit 3-23, C Viljoen 2-34, L Klazinga 2-50) Namibia 187-8 (S Burger 45, JJ Smit 33no, N Scholtz 30; L Onyango 2-29 , H Varaiya 2-33, S Tikolo 2-39) by 2 wickets.

Ad Feedback

- Fairfax Media

Special offers
Opinion poll

Should bouncers be banned from cricket?

Yes - they're too dangerous

Neutral - it is what it is

No - it's just bad luck when it goes wrong

Vote Result

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content