Kenya's cricket World Cup hopes take nosedive

AARON GOILE
Last updated 19:23 17/01/2014

Relevant offers

Cricket

U-turn sees super over brought back to decide a tied Cricket World Cup final Michael Clarke set to play Sydney grade cricket as recovering continues Sri Lanka bowler Nuwan Kulasekara reprimanded for send-off of Luke Ronchi India and England face knockout clash for spot in Tri-Series final against Australia Taranaki laugh off Sinclair's accusations over Hawke Cup challenge Sri Lanka have the last laugh as they beat New Zealand in final ODI Stuff's Cricket World Cup team and player power rankings - week two Live ball-by-ball: Black Caps vs Sri Lanka Cheeky Brendon McCullum letter asks bosses to excuse Black Caps fans from work Live scorecard: Black Caps vs Sri Lanka - ODI 7

Kenya's hopes of qualifying for next year's World Cup have nosedived after suffering their second loss in as many games at the qualifying tournament in New Zealand.

The 2003 semifinalists yesterday went down to Namibia by two wickets at Mt Maunganui's Bay Oval.

Namibia are two from two after upsetting the Netherlands in their first fixture.

Having won the toss, Kenya found themselves in big trouble at 11-3 and never really recovered.

Veteran Steve Tikolo top scored with 47, while Rakep Patel (44), Morris Ouma (32) and Hiren Varaiya  (32) chipped in to help Kenya reach 186-8 in their 50 overs.

Namibia left-arm seamer JJ Smit finished with figures of 3-23 off 10 overs, including two maidens.

In reply, Namibia stuttered to 26-2 in the 10th over, but a patient 45 off 97 balls from No 3 Sarel Burger got his side close, before Smit's unbeaten 33 off 31 balls got them over the line with seven balls to spare.

Kenya 186-8 (S Tikolo 47, R Patel 44, M Ouma 32, H Varaiya 32; J Smit 3-23, C Viljoen 2-34, L Klazinga 2-50) Namibia 187-8 (S Burger 45, JJ Smit 33no, N Scholtz 30; L Onyango 2-29 , H Varaiya 2-33, S Tikolo 2-39) by 2 wickets.

Ad Feedback

- Fairfax Media

Special offers
Opinion poll

Should bouncers be banned from cricket?

Yes - they're too dangerous

Neutral - it is what it is

No - it's just bad luck when it goes wrong

Vote Result

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content