Win boosts Canadian hopes but work to do

BRENDON EGAN
Last updated 19:36 21/01/2014

Relevant offers

Cricket

New Zealand Cricket names domestic contracts Jayawardene out for 165 as Sri Lanka pile on runs Oram, Bell join White Ferns coaching staff Zimbabwe wield axe after Afghanistan draw Stead: Canterbury cricket contracts mostly local Cricket bosses turn down Games invite Jayawardene hits ton to help Sri Lanka recovery Batsman Craig Cachopa signs deal with Sussex Kane Williamson banned over bowling action New Zealand's top female cricketers to be paid

Canada gained their first win of the World Cup cricket qualifying tournament today, but face an uphill battle to make the Super Six stage.

The Canadiens overcame winless Nepal by 12 runs at Christchurch's Hagley Oval to claim a much-needed victory after back-to-back losses.

If Canada are to keep their hopes of a fourth consecutive appearance at the one-day World Cup alive they will need a lop-sided win over Scotland in their final game on Thursday.

Batting first in a rain-shortened 41-over clash, Canada posted a strong score of 255 for nine.

Nepal had them in a spot of bother at 54 for three, but an 85-run fourth wicket partnership between Nitish Kumar and Raza-ur-Rehman helped steady the ship. Kumar fell for 67, with ur-Rehman doing a fine job of holding the innings together, before he was run out for 89.

Needing to score at more than six an over, Nepal got off to a dreadful start with Sagar Pun dismissed in the third delivery of the runchase.

Gyanendra Malla notched an excellent 86, which included nine fours, but when he departed in the 31st over Nepal's chances of winning were dealt a major blow.

Canada 255-9 in 41 overs (R-ur-Rehman 89, N Kumar 67, H Tariq 34; S Kami 3-64, B Regmi 2-51) beat Nepal 243-8 in 41 overs (G Malla 86, P Airee 26, Regmi 25no; K Chohan 4-59) by 12 runs.

Ad Feedback

- Fairfax Media

Special offers
Opinion poll

Was a life ban from cricket a fair punishment for Lou Vincent?

Yes, he's admitted to match-fixing and deserves his punishment

It doesn't go far enough in my opinion

No, it's only going to deter whistle blowers in the future

It's too harsh. A two-year ban would have been fair

Vote Result

Related story: (See story)

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content