Kaushal Silva century gives Sri Lanka advantage

Last updated 06:50 29/01/2014

Relevant offers

Cricket

Black Caps series with Zimbabwe may not be screened in New Zealand Black Caps batsmen need to adjust expectations against Zimbabwe Vaughan: England must seek to wrap up Ashes series victory at Trent Bridge Jimmy Anderson injury leaves England selectors with conundrum for fourth test Brown: World-weary Australian captain Michael Clarke fast approaching endgame Zimbabwe make four changes for ODI series with Black Caps in Harare The Ashes: England on brink of big victory over Australia in third test Proteas bounce back in final session in Dhaka test Mitchell Johnson joins Australian 300 test wicket club in style South African bowler Dale Steyn joins 400-test wickets club

Sri Lanka's Kaushal Silva hit his maiden test century to give the visitors a commanding advantage on day two of the first test against Bangladesh.

Sri Lanka reached 237-1 in its first innings at tea on Tuesday in response to Bangladesh's 232.

Silva was unbeaten on 111 and Kumar Sangakkara was not out on 59.

After resuming on the overnight score of 60-0, Sri Lanka lost only one wicket over the day's first two sessions, with Dimuth Karunaratne out for 53, caught at silly mid-off off the bowling of Shakib Al Hasan (1-41).

Both Silva and Sangakkara capitalized on Bangladesh's lackluster bowling in the second session and paced the scoring rate to set for a big first innings lead.

Silva was repeatedly beaten by the pace bowlers in the early stages of the day, and was troubled by Al-Amin Hossain.

On 39, he edged to wicket-keeper Mushfqur Rahim but the captain could not hold the catch. When Silva was on 42, Shamsur Rahman dropped a chance at second slip, frustrating the bowlers who had worked hard through the session.

Capitalising on those reprieves, Silva brought up century with a pull short off Shakib through fine-leg region, and hit 14 fours and a six before tea.

Ad Feedback

- AP

Special offers
Opinion poll

Should bouncers be banned from cricket?

Yes - they're too dangerous

Neutral - it is what it is

No - it's just bad luck when it goes wrong

Vote Result

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content