Winning finale for Otago in Plunket Shield

Last updated 05:00 26/02/2014

Relevant offers

Cricket

New Zealand Cricket names domestic contracts Jayawardene out for 165 as Sri Lanka pile on runs Oram, Bell join White Ferns coaching staff Zimbabwe wield axe after Afghanistan draw Stead: Canterbury cricket contracts mostly local Cricket bosses turn down Games invite Jayawardene hits ton to help Sri Lanka recovery Batsman Craig Cachopa signs deal with Sussex Kane Williamson banned over bowling action New Zealand's top female cricketers to be paid

Otago finished their Plunket Shield season in style, beating Northern Districts by four wickets in Dunedin yesterday.

But they made hard work of a modest target of 131 for victory crashing to 79 for six before Nathan McCullum and Derek de Boorder steered the side to success with an unbroken 52-run stand for the seventh wicket.

Fears for the fitness of Otago and Black Caps all-rounder Jimmy Neesham were allayed when he returned to bowl yesterday after a shoulder injury the previous day.

Northern made a better job of their second innings, posting 324 after being forced to follow on.

Meanwhile in Auckland the home side leads by 424 runs with two wickets in hand entering the final day against Wellington at Eden Park's Outer Oval.

Auckland batsman Craig Cachopa followed his double century in the first innings by top scoring with 90 in the second.

Short scoreboards:

At Dunedin: Otago 326 and 131-6 (N McCullum 38no, J Ryder 30, M Bracewell 24; A Verma 2-29, I Sodhi 2-35) beat Northern Districts 132 and 324 (J Carter 87, S Kuggeleijn 61, M Santner 56, D Flynn 50; N Beard 4-62, N McCullum 3-110).

At Auckland: Auckland 394 and 328-8 (Craig Cachopa 90, C de Grandhomme 71, T McIntosh 39, C Munro 37; M Gillespie 351, M Tugaga 2-57, J Franklin 2-90) v Wellington 298 (L Woodcock 79no; C de Grandhomme 6-24).

Ad Feedback

- The Press

Special offers
Opinion poll

Was a life ban from cricket a fair punishment for Lou Vincent?

Yes, he's admitted to match-fixing and deserves his punishment

It doesn't go far enough in my opinion

No, it's only going to deter whistle blowers in the future

It's too harsh. A two-year ban would have been fair

Vote Result

Related story: (See story)

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content