Parramatta's Luke Burt announces retirement

JOE BARTON
Last updated 17:24 15/06/2012

Relevant offers

League

Kemp: Memo to Steve: Get Benji back in black Warriors romp to biggest win in eight years Konrad Hurrell happy to stick with his family Gould: Second-tier NRL cap serves no purpose Manly, Bulldogs stay lead way in NRL Bulldogs get first win in Melbourne since 2005 Chiefs targeting Eels young gun Tepai Moeroa Matulino return boosts Warriors for Eels clash Sharks young Kiwi still looks up to Todd Carney Foran steers Sea Eagles to thrashing of Tigers

Parramatta veteran Luke Burt will retire at the end of the 2012 NRL season as a one-club player.

The 31-year-old, who was dropped to NSW Cup side Wentworthville earlier this season, announced on Friday that he decided long ago this would be his final season.

Burt will join close friend Nathan Hindmarsh in retiring at season's end, after the Eels skipper announced earlier this year that he would also hang up the boots.

But Burt has agreed to sign on and become part of the club's coaching staff from 2013 onwards.

He will retire as the club's all-time leading tryscorer in a first grade career that has spanned 14 seasons.

"I've loved every minute playing for Parramatta and being part of this great club, and I made the decision some time ago that this would be my last year," Burt said in a statement on Friday.

"Joining the full-time staff next year will be a new challenge for me and it's one I'm excited about."

Eels' chief executive Bob Bentley said Burt would be remembered as one of the club's greats.

"Luke Burt will rightly go down as one of this club's great players and favourite sons," Bentley said.

"He's developed himself into one of the game's great point-scorers and to build a resume like his takes more than just talent - his professionalism and work ethic has always been second to none."

Ad Feedback

- AAP

Special offers
Opinion poll

Did the Warriors make the right decision to release Kevin Locke?

Yep, he wasn't going to get a go with Tomkins in the side

No. He's a great player. They should never have let him go

They shouldn't have signed Tomkins in the first place

He was past his best. But he'll do well in England

Vote Result

Related story: (See story)

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content