Oprah Winfrey says disgraced cyclist Lance Armstrong did not "come clean in the manner" she expected.
Armstrong confessed to doping during an interview with Winfrey taped yesterday, just a couple of hours after a wrenching apology to staff at the Livestrong charity he founded and has now been forced to surrender.
The emotional day ended with 2-1/2 hours of questions from Winfrey at a downtown Austin, Texas hotel, where she said the world's most famous cyclist was "forthcoming" as she asked him in detail about doping allegations that followed him throughout his seven Tour de France victories.
Speaking on CBS This Morning, Winfrey said she had not planned to address Armstrong's confession before the interview aired on her network but, "by the time I left Austin and landed in Chicago, you all had already confirmed it".
"So I'm sitting here now because it's already been confirmed," she added.
"He did not come clean in the manner I expected. I was surprised," said Winfrey, who said Armstrong was highly prepared and had "certainly prepped himself".
The session was to be broadcast on Thursday but Winfrey said it would now run in two parts over two nights because there was so much material.
Winfrey would not characterise whether Armstrong seemed contrite.
"I would say he met the moment," she said.
The confession was a stunning reversal for a proud athlete and celebrity who sought lavish praise in the court of public opinion and used courtrooms to punish his critics.
For more than a decade, Armstrong dared anybody who challenged his version of events to prove it. Finally, he told the tale himself after promising during the weekend to answer Winfrey's questions "directly, honestly and candidly".
The cyclist was stripped of his Tour titles, lost most of his endorsements and was forced to leave Livestrong last year after the US Anti-Doping Agency issued a damning, 1000-page report that accused him of masterminding a long-running doping scheme.
REDUCING THE BAN
The International Cycling Union, or UCI, issued a statement on Tuesday saying it was aware of the reports that Armstrong had confessed to Winfrey. The governing body for the sport urged Armstrong to tell his story to an independent commission it has set up to examine claims it covered up suspicious samples from the cyclist, accepted financial donations from him and helped him avoid detection in doping tests.
The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) says Armstrong must confess under oath to seek a reduction in his lifetime ban from sports.
WADA says it "read with interest media reports suggesting a television 'confession' made by Lance Armstrong" to talk show host Winfrey.
Armstrong reportedly hopes to return to competition in recognised triathlon events.
However, WADA says "only when Mr Armstrong makes a full confession under oath - and tells the anti-doping authorities all he knows about doping activities - can any legal and proper process for him to seek any reopening or reconsideration of his lifetime ban commence."
Director general David Howman said Armstrong's interview with Winfrey was "hardly the same as giving evidence to a relevant authority" that deals with doping rules and sanctions.
"He's got to follow a certain course," Howman said.
"That is not talking to a talk show host."
The agency says athletes must pass on details of performance-enhancing drug use "to the relevant anti-doping authorities".
International Olympic Committee vice president Thomas Bach said Armstrong should provide a complete confession to USADA or WADA.
"The TV interview is not the right platfom," he said.
"If he says in general terms that he used prohibited substances, for himself and his reputation it would come a little late. For the fight against doping, it would not help. He has to show how he managed to get around the tests and whether there was somebody who helped him."
Armstrong started the day yesterday with a visit to the headquarters of Livestrong, the charity he founded in 1997 and turned into a global force on the strength of his athletic dominance and personal story of surviving testicular cancer that had spread to his lungs and brain.
About 100 Livestrong staff members gathered in a conference room as Armstrong told them "I'm sorry".
He choked up during a 20-minute talk, expressing regret for the long-running controversy tied to performance-enhancers had caused, but stopped short of admitting he used them.
Before he was done, several members were in tears when he urged them to continue the charity's mission, helping cancer patients and their families.
"Heartfelt and sincere", is how Livestrong spokeswoman Katherine McLane described his speech.
Armstrong later huddled with almost a dozen people before stepping into a room set up at a downtown Austin hotel for the interview with Winfrey. The group included close friends and lawyers. They exchanged handshakes and smiles, but declined comment.
Winfrey has promoted her interview, one of the biggest since she launched the OWN network in 2011, as a "no-holds barred" session, and after the voluminous USADA report - which included testimony from 11 former teammates - she said she went into the session with 112 questions ready to go. Not all of them were asked, she said, but many were.
USADA chief executive Travis Tygart, a long-time critic of Armstrong's, called the drug regimen practised while Armstrong led the US Postal Service team "the most sophisticated, professionalised and successful doping programme that sport has ever seen". USADA did not respond to requests for comment about Armstrong's confession.
A COSTLY CONFESSION
For years, Armstrong went after his critics ruthlessly during his reign as cycling champion. He scolded some in public and didn't hesitate to punish outspoken riders during the race itself. He waged legal battles against others in court.
At least one of his opponents, the London-based Sunday Times, has already filed a lawsuit to recover about US$500,000 it paid him to settle a libel case, and Dallas-based SCA Promotions, which tried to deny Armstrong a promised bonus for a Tour de France win, has threatened to bring another lawsuit seeking to recover more than US$7.5 million awarded by an arbitration panel.
In Australia, the government of South Australia said it would seek the repayment of several million dollars in appearance fees paid to Armstrong for competing in the Tour Down Under in 2009, 2010 and 2011.
"We'd be more than happy for Mr Armstrong to make any repayment of monies to us," South Australia Premier Jay Weatherill said.
Betsy Andreu, the wife of former Armstrong teammate Frankie Andreu, was one of the first to publicly accuse Armstrong of using performance-enhancing drugs. She called news of Armstrong's confession "very emotional and very sad", and choked up when asked to comment.
"He used to be one of my husband's best friends and because [Andreu] wouldn't go along with the doping, he got kicked to the side," she said.
"Lance could have a positive impact if he tells the truth on everything. He's got to be completely honest."
Betsy Andreu testified in SCA's arbitration case challenging the bonus in 2005, saying Armstrong admitted in an Indiana hospital room in 1996 that he had taken many performance-enhancing drugs, a claim Armstrong vehemently denied.
"It would be nice if he would come out and say the hospital room happened," Andreu said. "That's where it all started."
Former teammate Floyd Landis, who was stripped of the 2006 Tour de France title for doping, has filed a federal whistle-blower lawsuit that accused Armstrong of defrauding the US Postal Service.
An attorney familiar with Armstrong's legal problems said the Justice Department is highly likely to join the lawsuit. The False Claims Act lawsuit could result in Armstrong paying a substantial amount of money to the US Government. The deadline for the department to join the case is Thursday, though the department could seek an extension if necessary.
According to the attorney, who works outside the government, the lawsuit alleges that Armstrong defrauded the US Government based on his years of denying use of performance-enhancing drugs. The attorney spoke on condition of anonymity because the source was not authorised to speak on the record about the matter.
The lawsuit most likely to be influenced by a confession might be the Sunday Times case. Potential perjury charges stemming from Armstrong's sworn testimony in the 2005 arbitration fight would not apply because of the statute of limitations. Armstrong was not deposed during the federal investigation that was closed last year.
Armstrong is said to be worth around US$100 million. But most sponsors dropped him after USADA's scathing report - at the cost of tens of millions of dollars - and soon after, he left the board of Livestrong.