Cycling could be dumped from the Olympics if Lance Armstrong shows the sport's governing body covered up a widespread doping scheme, International Olympic Committee (IOC) member Dick Pound says.
Pound said the IOC might be left with no choice other than to take drastic action if Armstrong was able to prove the International Cycling Union (UCI) had acted improperly.
"We could say, 'look, you've clearly got a problem why don't we give you four years, eight years to sort it out'," Pound said.
"And when you think you're ready come on back we'll see whether it would be a good idea to put you back on the programme."
Pound, a former head of the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), said it was clear the IOC needed to take matters into its own hands in the wake of the Armstrong doping scandal.
"The only way it (cycling) is going to clean up is if all these people say 'hey, we're no longer in the Olympics and that's where we want to be so let's earn our way back into it'," Pound said in a telephone interview.
"The IOC would have to deal with it - the (UCI) is not known for its strong actions to anti-doping.
"It was the same in weightlifting a few years ago. All of a sudden when you get right up against it things go fuzzy and they say, 'well, we can't punish innocent athletes in these sports by dropping the sport from the programme'."
Pound made his comments after talk show host Oprah Winfrey confirmed media reports that Armstrong admitted in an interview taped yesterday, that he used performance-enhancing drugs.
The full details will not be known until the interview is broadcast on Thursday and Friday (US time) although CBS reported Armstrong indicated he might be willing to testify against others.
"You have to wait to see to what degree he has admitted, to what degree he is prepared to help," said Pound.
"Some of the press reports I've seen say he had a lot of help from high cycling officials and he is willing to tell all about that."
Pound helped start WADA and headed up the IOC ethics committee that cleaned up the organisation following the Salt Lake City Olympic corruption scandal.
But the Canadian lawyer said any possible changes to cycling's status were unlikely to happen until after the next IOC presidential election in August.
"I don't think under the current administration, that has only a year left, that anything that drastic would happen, but maybe under a new president would say 'all right, we've got this started, now once and for all let's send out a message'."
WADA, founded after the Festina doping affair in the 1998 Tour de France and now headed by New Zealander David Howman, has long been critical of the UCI's handling of doping in the sport with Pound routinely slamming cycling bosses.
Despite agreeing that Armstrong cheated his way to the top, US Andi-Doping Agency (USADA) and the UCI have continued to trade thinly veiled insults.
UCI president Pat McQuaid said USADA, whose damning investigation led to Armstrong's downfall, should have handed over its dossier on the disgraced American to a neutral investigator and that anti-doping agencies needed to share the blame because their tests failed to catch him.
USADA responded by saying the UCI's banning of Armstrong was not the end of the problem because USADA's investigation showed doping was rife in professional cycling.
In a recent interview on 60 Minutes Sports, USADA chief Travis Tygart said the UCI had wrongfully accepted US$100,000 gift from Armstrong.
Pound said a possible cover-up could be an even bigger story that was still to come.
"There will be a lot of people watching for that and if in fact there was assistance from the UCI and Lance describes it, that could be the real assistance he could give to the fight, and result in a reduction of his life sentence [a ban from all competition]," he said.
Will Shane Cameron beat Kali Meehan on Saturday?