Players want end to Sanzar bickering

Last updated 16:15 19/08/2010

Relevant offers

Rugby

Canes have much to gain against Crusaders Wyatt Crockett working to shed specialist tag Kurt Baker keen to play full Super season Nerves or not, Chiefs' Tex has set his goals Italy look to shock England in Six Nations UK league coach searches for Crusaders' secret Quade Cooper's fixed-up knee gets early test Aussie teams face uneven playing field - White Smith and Dickson in Highlanders midfield Smith will lead Hurricanes in opener - Hammett

South Africa's professional rugby players have warned internal bickering within the southern hemisphere grouping Sanzar could have "serious implications" for the sport worldwide.

The reported divisions within the group that has steered professional rugby in the southern hemisphere since 1996 threatened the livelihoods of hundreds of professional players in Australia, New Zealand and South Africa, South African Professional Rugby Players Association head Piet Heymans said in a statement released Thursday.

South Africa has reportedly threatened to walk away from Sanzar over differences with the Australian Rugby Union and the New Zealand Rugby Union, threatening the future of the Tri-Nations and Super 15 competitions.

"The players view Super rugby and the Tri-Nations as the best rugby competitions in the world and also the toughest to participate in," Heymans said. "The players are concerned that emotions are driving the current differences within Sanzar.

"Should the Sanzar partnership be dissolved it could have serious implications, not just for South African rugby but world rugby as a whole."

Heymans said professional players in South Africa, Australia and New Zealand depended on the income Sanzar derived from broadcasting deals around the Super 15 and Tri-Nations tournaments for their livelihoods. Any dispute which dissolved Sanzar's future also threatened professionalism, he said.

"The Sanzar broadcasting agreement ... is the lifeline of South African rugby and should not unnecessarily be put at risk," he said.

"During the renewal of the Sanzar broadcast deal various alternatives were investigated and the reality is that there are not viable options that can provide the players and the public with exciting world class rugby."

Heymans said a players' voice might be needed during discussions about Sanzar's future to ensure their best interests were represented.

"It may well be in the interest of Sanzar that the players are more directly involved in the administration of Sanzar, especially when important decisions and differences are made and discussed," he said.

Ad Feedback

- AP

Special offers
Opinion poll

Has rugby had a fair deal at the Halberg Awards over the years?

No. They should have won more gongs than they have.

It's been about right.

More than a fair deal. Other sports are more deserving.

Vote Result

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content