NZRU, ARU drop the ball

BY DAVID MOFFETT
Last updated 05:00 18/04/2009

Relevant offers

Our Experts

Fox's cunning and Foster's flair good for All Blacks Hansen has much to prove as All Blacks coach Steve Hansen must now show likeable side Too early for Sir Richie, what about Sir Jock? Pressure on Hansen to keep All Blacks on top Crusaders pay for Zac Guildford's misconduct All Blacks assistant coaches may end up foes What part did All Blacks win play in election? Franchise idea super silly or Tew brilliance? Get on board the Twickenham guessing game

OPINION: A leaderless, rudderless and totally inept organisation. For once I am not talking about the New Zealand Rugby Union (NZRU) but about Sanzar, or at least the Australian and New Zealand components of it.

Sanzar is the umbrella organisation of the Super 14 and Tri-Nations.

Super 14 is in dire trouble.

How do we know? The world's greatest rugby administrator, John O'Neill, has said as much. He told the Sydney Morning Herald that pay TV ratings were "average", which is not ideal when trying to renegotiate rights fees.

The crowds at all matches have been down, as they have been in New Zealand. No mention of any of the reasons for this decline though.

No mention by O'Neill of the damage to the game wrought by the Australian Rugby Union (ARU)-inspired ELVs (Experimental Law Variations).

In their panic to try to compete with the other three football codes in Australia the ELVs were introduced to try to provide nonstop action as a way of combating the popularity of Aussie rules, league and football.

They have been an abject failure. Most will be ditched by the International Rugby Board in May. As predicted in a previous column, the northern hemisphere dumped most of the ELVs.

Why? Because in the north they have a better understanding of the history, uniqueness and authenticity of rugby. They understand that rugby is a stop-start game, played by all shapes and sizes and levels of expertise.

They also have authentic and stable competitions for their fans to watch, which they are doing in ever-increasing numbers. If Australian and New Zealand administrators want a different game, get a job in another code.

I am sick to death of hearing O'Neill trying to justify his position by bleating about how difficult the competition is in Australia. I suggest he hops on a plane, preferably with a one-way ticket to Ireland to see how they cope with Gaelic sports and football.

Rugby faces the same stiff competition all over the world, with the exception of New Zealand and Wales.

No mention either by O'Neill of all the uncertainty surrounding yet another replacement for Super 14. Having been thoroughly outplayed by the South African Rugby Union, it is believed New Zealand and Australia are considering a trans-Tasman competition with teams from Japan. Yet another bizarre, half-baked option that fills old and new fans with genuine fear for the future of the game in the southern hemisphere.

I just hope this is a rather crude attempt to put pressure on South Africa and not a serious option. If they can't make the current format work and South Africa are not prepared, unlike New Zealand and the NPC, to sacrifice their Currie Cup for the benefit of Australia, then a proper Trans-Tasman competition along the lines I recommended months ago, should be considered.

Ad Feedback

While the Super 14 implodes what are the views of the NZRU. Who knows?

Typically we have not heard from their all but invisible CEO Steve Tew. Just when long-suffering fans want to hear from their governing body, what do we get?

Nothing, nada, zilch, zero.

Just another example of the NZRU seemingly happy to toe the Australian line. There are times when I firmly believe that the ARU sees the NZRU as little more than a seventh state such is their ability to impact on the future of rugby in this country.

David Moffett is the interim CEO of Regional Rugby Wales.

- © Fairfax NZ News

15 comments
Post a comment
eraka   #15   10:04 pm Apr 22 2009

Some valid points in his article. People back in nz are blind if they think nothing is wrong with the S14 and Tri Nations (timing of the season, repetitive nature etc). Although some of the ELVs accommodate common sense, the collapsing of the maul and introduction of the free kick at the breakdown have seen our game replace substance with style. We can slate Moffett as much as we want but I would suggest he has more credentials than most and is likely to have one or two sensible ideas.

monty   #14   02:58 pm Apr 21 2009

David Muppet must have leeks growing out of his ears if he thinks Tew is invisible - try picking up a paper or listening to a radio while you're taking your bitter pills and shoulder chips idiot

Morgan   #13   04:25 pm Apr 20 2009

Why don't they just play the NPC first then have an 8 team knock out stage and call them the NPC Champions but the top 6 teams go through to a SUPER 20 Rugby competition (player draft could happen to strengthen teams that go through and reward good players). 5 from Australia, 6 from SA, 2 from Argentina, 1 from Japan & 6 NZ teams. Short Knock out tournament just like the World Cup format? I'd love to see Hawke's Bay Magpies win something like that, gee that would be interesting, but I don't think that would fly because of money.

Frisbee   #12   02:01 pm Apr 20 2009

Yawn. Who is more crap - him or Stephen Jones. What is wrong with the S14 - nothing! other than the schedule needs some tuning. What is wrong with the Currie Cup - nothing! What is wrong with the Air NZ cup - really it is just 'club' footy and a feeder to S14, like Jersey Flegg is to the NRL. Letting Argentina players into our S14 teams is a good idea and maybe the 15th Super team if it ever happens - what about on the Gold Coast at Titans new stadium. Big'ish Kiwi, Jap population on the GC and am sure Argy players would prefer Broadbeach to St Kilda or Sumner or St Clair - brrrrr.

Lee   #11   10:35 pm Apr 19 2009

#5, #6, #7, #9

So you think NZ should ditch the NPC for a Super 15?

You think they should ditch South Africa for a competitive Island team with a massive TV base(not) or a lucrative, competitive(not) Japanese team? Do you think Sky will still want to pay for that? Do you think that the NZRU will be able to afford to keep their ABs if they can't get TV deals? You think the player exodus is bad now?

Why have NZ and SA been the best performing sides in World rugby? A. The sport being the most played in the country i.e. getting the most funds(changing in SA now) B. A strong, competitive domestic competition with HISTORY to keep fans interested. There is a reason why the Football premiership in England rarely changes, and that is the rivalries built by History. Bring back AUckland Canterbury games with all their All Blacks, not a team from the top half of the South Island(who never play outside CHCH) against a team from the top of th North Island*who never play outside of Auckland).

Rugby has and always should be a game for all sizes, and for anyone. The beauty has always been that a 120kg prop can play in a team with 90kg wing, and they both still have important roles. If that is such a bad thing maybe you should have a long look at what you think rugby is - you might just find rugby league is what you have been after.

Mike   #10   12:59 pm Apr 19 2009

Well there is no doubt that the Super 14 is lacking in peoples interest, I for one think S.A. are on the right track with keeping the currie cup high on the list. The super 14 is in need of a revamp but not at the expense of the Currie cup or NPC. I much prefer to watch the S.A. teams playing than I do the Auzzie teams.

Start up a new comp with a conference system where teams play in separate groups divided up by the winners of the pervious year in one group the runners up in another group split the teams so they are spread evenly according to where they placed in the pervious years comp. Have a few "out of the hat draws" but not so every team plays each other. The top teams from each group the go into a play off with each other, A bit like how the world cup plays out. A few more teams could be added and the comp would only run for the same length of time or less than it is now. Put a lot of focus into the NPC again.

E.G. Group A; 1 Chiefs, 2 Bulls, 3 Blues, 4 Brumbies, 5 Force, 6 Lions, 7 Reds Group B; 1 Sharks, 2 Hurricanes, 3 Waratahs, 4 Crusaders, 5 Highlanders, 6 Stormers, 7 Cheetahs

The Top 4 from each group move into a play off,

G/A 1 V G/B 3 G/B 1 V G/A 3 G/A 2 V G/B 4 G/B 2 V G/A 4 ETC The Bottom 6 could play off to sort out ranking for the next years comp. Just a thought......

StunTheMullet   #9   10:01 am Apr 19 2009

Another one pandering to his northern paymasters.

Rugbyman   #8   01:44 am Apr 19 2009

Cant argue with that. " authentic and stable competitions for their fans to watch" How stable is the future of the super14 ? Trinations ?

Kelly   #7   08:08 pm Apr 18 2009

David Moffett is an idiot,enough said.

Brasso   #6   05:02 pm Apr 18 2009

This piece reeks of xenophobia. Still, David, I suppose you have to write whatever you feel will tap into the basest minds of the tabloid readers.


Show 1-5 of 15 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content