All Blacks respond well to defeats

BY MARC HINTON
Last updated 11:10 28/07/2009

Related Links

Expansive mistakes won't deter All Blacks All Blacks relaxed after blowout All Blacks always targetted this week - de Villiers All Blacks backline needs to deliver

Relevant offers

Our Experts

South African whinges will get them nowhere Super franchises in battle for hearts and minds Relaxed West Coast vibe contributes to fun Fox's cunning and Foster's flair good for All Blacks Hansen has much to prove as All Blacks coach Steve Hansen must now show likeable side Too early for Sir Richie, what about Sir Jock? Pressure on Hansen to keep All Blacks on top Crusaders pay for Zac Guildford's misconduct All Blacks assistant coaches may end up foes

OPINION: Time for a reality check, folks. These All Blacks just aren't that good. The thing is, they're actually not that bad either.

In that respect it's hard to know what to make of the weekend's 19-28 defeat to the Boks in Bloemfontein.

Should we be alarmed at the gormless errors, the tactical naïveté, the attacking limitations, the lineout lapses, the shortcomings in the maul and the just damn brainless rugby?

Or should we instead applaud their competitiveness, their ability to dig themselves out of holes, their defensive solidity and their scrummaging strength and just figure, what the heck, the dice were loaded last weekend on the Highveld?

My feeling is that right now the All Blacks have taken a step backwards. Injuries haven't helped, but the truth is they're just plain old off their game. Not a long way, mind, but far enough at this level for it to cost test matches.

In short, they're a good rugby team. Just not a great one.

Strangely, it's not dissimilar to the position they found themselves in pretty much a year ago when they lost two of their first three Tri-Nations matches and looked to be teetering on the brink. As we know, the correction came, and Graham Henry's men rattled off eight straight test victories to scoop the silverware and add another Grand Slam to boot.

But is there another similarly seismic rectification in them this year? Well, we are about to find out.

The All Blacks right about now are caught in a bit of an international no-man's land - nowhere near the sort of form that would be required to, say, win a World Cup; but still good enough to take care of business most days of the rugby week.

It's just that last weekend in Bloemfontein wasn't your regular test match week. They'd played in Auckland just seven days earlier; they'd made the long haul to the other side of the world; they were jet-lagged, at altitude and a little beaten-up; and they come up against a very good Springboks side that is a tough nut to crack indeed at home.

But this week in Durban it's a different kettle of fish, even if they are up against the same Boks who truth be told have a fair bit of improvement in them too. They're at sea level for starters - a much more familiar environment for these New Zealanders.

Plus they're well settled, and can't use travel weariness as any sort of an excuse this week.

Also you have to figure that no doubt having sat through a video horror show of their Bloemfontein bumbling, they'll be fairly angry young men keen to right a few wrongs. They should be a bit surly this week.

Ad Feedback

Their skill level was, frankly, awful last weekend and that has to be the big work-on this week. Not that Henry should have to be teaching elite professionals who train all week how to catch and pass a rugby ball.

I'm anticipating a much-improved All Black performance, one where they play the territory game a lot better than they did in Bloem, and one where they execute their basic skills one heck of a lot better.

Whether it's good enough to secure the one win needed from this tough double-header will depend on how marked the improvement is, and how much the Boks step up their own game. For a side that had the sort of dominance they did at Vodacom Park, Peter de Villiers' men sure lacked for clear-cut scoring chances.

There's been a fair bit of heat applied to the All Black lineout in the aftermath of another shoddy display at the weekend, with former All Black great Andy Haden going as far as to suggest in one interview that it was time to get a forwards coach who actually played in the pack - a fairly direct shot at Steve Hansen.

Here's what Haden told Newstalk ZB on Sunday when discussing the All Blacks' relative inexperience in the pack at the moment: "You need a forwards coach at that time... and a forwards coach is someone who knows quite a lot about organising a forward pack.

"Some bloke who's played centre or wing and who's put on a few pounds doesn't qualify because the bathroom scales say so. He qualifies because he knows his forward play well. Unfortunately Steve Hansen doesn't qualify..."

Now that's a pretty tasty hand grenade lobbed in Hansen's direction by a fairly astute former All Black.

Whether it's fair is debatable. Should not having played in the pack disqualify Hansen from coaching his men in its dark arts? Maybe. Maybe not. Is it Hansen's fault his hooker's over-throwing, or his caller is going to the back too early, too often? No. But it's his responsibility to iron out the issues.

The point is while the All Blacks are putting in the sort of untidy performances that they are now, they're leaving themselves open to this sort of criticism. Worse, they're leaving themselves vulnerable to defeat.

It's why they will regard a fairly major correction this week as a must-have.

I fully expect it. Henry's selection gambles last week didn't work. This week he has to be smarter in terms of who he uses and how. The coaches are being challenged now as much as the players.

But more importantly whoever he sends out there has to play with responsibility, with authority and with accuracy. All Blacks tend to respond well to defeats. Make their adjustments. I fully expect a major one this week and an All Black victory in Durban.

 

- © Fairfax NZ News

43 comments
Post a comment
Skipper   #43   12:17 am Aug 03 2009

Guys! Rugby, like the economy is a cyclical thing. You have ups and also downs. The ABs have however had more ups than downs in the past so you guys are not used to downs! Things will change and we in South Africa still rate the ABs as our biggest and toughest opponents! Honestly! Most of us support the ABs when playing opposition other than SA.You guys have been rated number one in the world between world cups but seem to have struggled at world cup time. Maybe the thing has turned around? Maybe 2011 is yours if you do not panic and let Graham Henry sort out the problems and build towards 2011. Best of luck.

johnno42   #42   11:41 am Aug 02 2009

if the ab's respond well to defeat then they should be on fire to defend the bledisloe... at least thats what i hope.

Nigel du Preez   #41   01:24 am Jul 31 2009

I am disappointed with the Bloem test, fact is, we lost the battle there, not the war. Yes, we somehow seem in shambles.

For example, I think Ma'a is not creative enough, the ball seems to die there. he will make a greater impact off the bench. And the apparent lack of strike force in teh back three, although worrying, I think it requires merely a small adjustment. These south africans' are strong on defence. What happened to the 'grubber'. We need a tactical inside centre, this will also relief some pressure of our fly half(Donald).

Also, please ALL BLACKS, if you are reading this...the lack of brutality in teh pack is a pain to look at. And please, we need intensity when you do the HAKA. This is where the foundation is laid...fear instilled in the opposition.

Nigel du Preez

Warren   #40   09:50 pm Jul 30 2009

New Zealand supporters are just like us ... we hate losing!! That's stating the obvious but I feel one should genuinely stop bad mouthing the AB's and rather give a bit of credit to what is a magnificant SA side. Not all 15, but without a doubt this is an awesome pack. Dominant in the line outs, lose play and with the addition of Brussouw, the balance is just right. Playing on a hard field in Bloem also made the AB's task that much harder.

Like in the 90's when the AB's had Fitzpatick, Brooke, etc. That to, was a maginificent pack. What goes around comes around as they say and with the retirement of Bakkies, Matfield and Smit around the corner we must enjoy (objectively) the traits and gile of this magnificent pack of forwards. World class fetcher, sprinting 8th man, best lock combo in world rugby, bussling strong hooker, line out kings. Its just great to watch and enjoy. Its speaks volumes that NZ rugby can compete with what is a under strength team.

Who wins on Saturday is not the issue. But just to watch one v. two is the world is an absolute honour and seeing these athletes in full cry is what its all about. I just hope its another cracking addition in the long history of AB's v Springboks, am sure it will be!!

Ewoks   #39   09:42 pm Jul 30 2009

So Lee, thanks for 'your' definition of the physical battle. Here's a tip, scrums are usually won by the team with the better technique. Ask one of our smallest props ever, Olo Brown.

When differentiating between the the breakdown and the physical battle, do you really think 'clearing the rucks' is more to do with general physicality than it is the breakdown? Bahahahaha. Nice point on the tackles too, very seldom a ruck is formed directly from a tackle. Bahahahahaa, keep 'em coming.

Get some mongrel? Did you come up with that all by yourself champ?

Logan   #38   01:24 pm Jul 30 2009

Ok, fair enough, clearly the South African Rugby union are doing their job properly. I personally don't mind all that much about being second place, especially to a team that does so well considering all they have to go through and put up with, political and coaching issues. I like the talent coming through the NZ structure, it's just hte top end stuff that is a bit of a mess at the moment. SA love their currie cup, NZ needs to fall back in love with the NPC.

Go OTAGO! Ranfurly shield winners 31st July 2009!

bok   #37   11:58 am Jul 30 2009

The one question is - did the AB's bungling version of rugby also cause the Boks to play badly. As Marc says - in spite of all the errors, bad play and penalties they had, the Boks was still not all that convincing. Imagine what an Aussie team would have done with all that ball! ;)

Hopefully the Boks will also plan to use all the ball they are winning to better effect.

Not just NZ...   #36   11:18 am Jul 30 2009

Logan #35

The NZ$ is a far more capable of competing with the pound/euro than the South African Rand is.

There was an article on a South African website(I will try and find it) that listed 47 ex-Boks playing in Europe and 220 other south africans playing professional rugby in Europe.

So I think both countries are in a bind in terms of losing players, the Boks are just lucky they had the Lions tour so the experienced players didn't all leave after the World Cup win, whereas the ABs players did. South Africa will go through similar issues soon when Matfield, Smit and Habana call it a day and head north - Jean DeVilliers has jsut signed with Munster. I guess they are lucky that their youngsters will have played with the experienced guys a bit longer - e.g JPP, Pienar, Steyn, The Beast, Bismark, Spies, Brussow.

Logan   #35   11:02 am Jul 30 2009

So it's the end of the world because there is a team that currently, at full strength, full of talent and experience, is better than us? Not to mention that that team is reigning World Champs and the 3rd most experienced in their nations history. NZ is in a huge lull at the moment, $NZ can't compete with the pound or euro, NZRU/SANZAR like fiddling with things that don't need to be fiddled with, and the IRB keeps changing the rules. We are allowed to lose now and then, it means we're human, it's not like losing is a regular occurance, and we all know we can improve. Bring on Durban... also sack Smith, even John Mitchell had better attacking tactics than Smith, and Mitchell is a loon!

Lee   #34   10:15 am Jul 30 2009

Ewoks #22

To me the physical battle is all the collisions - i.e tackles, scrums, clearing the ruck at pace

By breakdown I mean the fight between the loosies.

My point being that the games the ABs win are the ones where Richie normally causes havoc at contact points even if the Boks are hitting harder and going forward he normally has the ability to hang in there and upset things. I thought on Saturday he wasn't near his best and for most of the game, Brussow won that battle.

Sorry should have made that more clear. Thank you for your two cents.


Show 1-33 of 43 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content