Junior ABs have every right to replace Maori

Last updated 13:23 14/06/2009

Relevant offers

Duncan Johnstone

Junior ABs have every right to replace Maori 20 questions that answer themselves Luke's blunder sign of the times South Africans would be no great loss 14 ways to make this season Super Is there another coach out there who can do a Deans? Why didn't Tana get a parachute earlier? Tietjens has the X-factor like no other These guys have got points to prove Deans spells double trouble for NZRU

OPINION: Common sense has prevailed with the Junior All Blacks getting preference again over New Zealand Maori as the No 2 side in our national game's order of merit.

Don't get me wrong, there's a place for the Maori side in New Zealand rugby as they have shown with some outstanding performances down the years and their strong contributions in many areas.

But that shouldn't come at the expense of the All Blacks and that's exactly what happened this year when the Maori side replaced the Junior All Blacks for the IRB's Pacific Nations tournament.

The All Blacks coaches, facing a season of rebuilding following a mass exodus after last year's World Cup, were severely limited in their options in the heart of the season.

Basically the Maori side were the only other team in action with other All Blacks contenders reduced to club rugby.

The All Blacks managed to get through a couple of injury problems despite these limitations as they forged on to complete a remarkable year.

What shouldn't be overlooked in the debate is the fact that the Junior All Blacks, despite being inactive in 2008, still played a part in this year's success.

Of the large All Blacks touring squad that headed north to win a Grand Slam, no fewer than 11 of the players were involved in the 2007 Junior side.

There's little doubt that the Junior All Blacks were instrumental in the development of the likes of Kieran Read, Stephen Donald, Anthony Tuitavake, John Afoa, Jerome Kaino, Jimmy Cowan and Andy Ellis. That's an opportunity they wouldn't have had under this year's restrictions so it's good to see the bigger picture being looked at.

There's no doubt that the leading Maori players will come into the equation with both the All Blacks and the Junior All Blacks anyway.

But the Juniors go beyond simply the development of players - they also provide a much-needed opportunity for the development of our top coaches beyond the Super 14.

In 2009 the All Blacks' rebuilding needs to continue and the rebirth of the Junior All Blacks provides Graham Henry and his selectors with a far broader canvas to work with.

The Maori side have been moth-balled although the NZRU will continue to look for opportunities for a side that certainly have international appeal. Whether that can happen in the current economic climate remains to be seen.

What should happen with New Zealand Maori is that they must be put near the top of any itinerary for incoming tours.

All the talk is of a need to return to more traditional tours with midweek fixtures.

Ad Feedback

Wales are hoping for that to happen on their 2010 visit to New Zealand and a clash with the Maori side should be a priority.

In the meantime there seems to be one obvious fixture for the Maori side. They aren't alone in missing out on the Pacific Nations Cup with our good friends across the Tasman pulling the Australia A team out of the tournament.

Given that New Zealand Maori and Australia A effectively played the final of the tournament this year - with the maori team winning - why not get them togerther again for a one-off match or a series on either side of the ditch?

Was this a good decision by the NZRU? Who would you like to see the maori side play in 2009 if a game could be arranged? Have your say below.

 

- © Fairfax NZ News

19 comments
Cobine   #19   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

I completely agree with this decision, never heard of an African American USA team have we? Black English team? Indiginous Australian team? So why on earth should we have a Maori side. It just invites racism, why can't we have a white only NZ team? No if we did it would be deemed racist. I say scrap the NZ maori team altogether and fund the Heartlands XV.

Ka Pai   #18   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

"The abs are now just a commodity used to generate sufficient money to satisfy the sponsors and perpetrate the commodity."

Well put Len! And who better to generate that then the Maori, when they face the other island nations in the haka face offs... it always makes the news! It's mean as!!

Joseph   #17   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

Andy....Tanirau Latimer and Scooter Waldron are both Maori and genuine opensides who made the wider training squad this year. Latimer came into calculations based on his outstanding performances against other national "B" teams like Oz and full national teams like Samoa, Fiji and Tonga in the Pacific Nations Tourny.....basically he was the "best" No7 on show. Liam Messam has played the majority of his rugby at 7 so dont know where you source your info from re Maori cant provide back-up for McCaw?????

Would they perform the same wearing Junior AB's jerseys over Maori jerseys... widely known and well documented by present and past Maori players.....the NZ Maori environment brings out the best in Maori players. Not surprising players Maori and non Maori alike find it tough to motivte yourself for NZ "C"...oh sorry Junior AB's! No history - no feeling - no ownership

McCav   #16   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

Come on James, Think. If the Maori contenders are good enough, they'd be inculded in the Junior ABs.

KF   #15   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

Fair enough if the NZRU are paying the bills. Posibly the Maori community and stakeholders should consider taking on the finacial issues associated with our team to ensure it's long term viability? It is very disappointing they are not on next years rugby calander.

marvinb   #14   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

I think people need to understand that it is the economic climate which put an end to the NZ Maori,Junior All Blacks are the better choice they were by far too strong in the Pacific Nations Cup when they were playing, but Maori barely won their games and were lucky to have won the final in which I am glad they did.But the JAB's bring most of the next best talent in every position within the country.

Crangs81   #13   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

Though i fully agree that the JAB's should take precedence over the maoris as it opens up the eigibilty to all players but apart from the Australia A team was there really any other competition amongst the PNC teams? Some of the Jnr AB's would've had a harder runout in club rugby. The maoris should play every touring side and tour once every 2 or three years

DAMN   #12   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

Just another DUMB move by our rugby union.When are they going to learn?

Bundy   #11   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

To add to the fixture list, why not get the Maori side to play the Barbarians next June?

If they are likely to go to Oz to play the Wallabies, why not a second game in NZ? It would generate huge interest as it would be their first time in NZ too (I think?).

Get them over here for a game in one of the provincial centres (e.g. Napier) to ensure a sell-out. What a great game it would be with two sides whose traditional game is attack.

Andy   #10   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

Absolutely the correct decision. How can our number 2 team be limited to only a few players of the right ethnicity?

Any Maori player that's good enough to push for the AB jersey will still get picked in the Jnr ABs, but so will any white or PI players. At the moment our biggest area of concern is backup to McCaw, and openside is not a position that has many Maori contenders at the moment so why shoot ourselves in the foot?

The Maori should be used for inbound tours as suggested, or perhaps an annual game against the Pacific Islanders.


Show 1-9 of 19 comments
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content