NZRU decides against provincial rugby changes
BY DUNCAN JOHNSTONE
Related Links
Relevant offers
Provincial
The New Zealand Rugby Union has buckled on proposed changes to the domestic competitions and opted for the status quo – retaining a 14-team premier competition and 12-team Heartland Championship for 2010.
The decision is a victory for the provinces and a knockback for NZRU chief executive Steve Tew who had overseen proposals to revamp the national structure into a 10 team Premier league, six-team Division One and a 10-team Heartland Championship.
The threat of legal action by affected unions – most likely Counties Manukau, Tasman, Manawatu and Northland - played a part in the u-turn.
But it appears to be only a stay of execution. Changes loom for 2011 when New Zealand hosts the World Cup and the domestic season will be severely squeezed.
Tew and his staff were working on changes in response to a meeting earlier this year when the viability of the national championship was severely questioned by everyone within the game.
But it seems a bumper Air New Zealand Cup where provinces covered their costs and produced a compelling championship has been enough to convince the NZRU board to stick with the current format – for the time being.
The ongoing collective bargaining process with the New Zealand Players' Association has also been a stumbling block to changes being implemented in time for next season.
In the end it seems things got too hard.
It's a second survival story for Northland and Tasman who had to fight hard last year to remain involved because of financial struggles.
It will also keep the peace in a sport that has had its share of struggles this year. That will surely have been a factor for the board who will be mindful of the need to keep the country unified in the buildup to the World Cup.
In a statement NZRU chairman Jock Hobbs said the board and management agreed that despite the significant amount of progress that had been made to identify and develop the 10-6-10 competition, the current collective employment negotiations taking place and other factors meant the proposed competition could not go ahead in 2010.
''A number of factors have changed since the board made its decisions in June and July. These include the fact that competition formats have become a fundamental part of the collective employment negotiations currently underway, the fact that we have appeals lodged by the Tasman and Counties-Manukau Rugby Unions and threatened legal action from other unions,'' he said.
''All of these matters were not likely to be resolved prior to the first quarter of 2010, and with outcomes uncertain and the need to create certainty for provincial unions and teams, it was not possible to go ahead with the new format in 2010.''
A number of provincial unions had also made submissions to the NZRU which, in some cases, indicated a change in their position on the proposed changes or at least the timing of those changes, he said.
The board's previous decision on the format of the domestic competitions in 2011 and 2012 remains as a 10-6-10 format at this time. This will be subject to continued negotiations with the NZRPA and the NZRU will be seeking to secure an affordable and sustainable player payment model and salary cap as key outcomes of collective bargaining. The format will also be discussed further with Provincial Unions.
In announcing the decision on Friday after a lengthy board meeting on Thursday, Hobbs and NZRU CEO Steve Tew noted that the initial impetus for changes to domestic competitions came from the nine non-Franchise Host Provincial Unions which collectively requested urgent intervention from the NZRU in April.
Tew said the NZRU was focused on finalising a new collective employment agreement with the NZRPA, which will be critical to determining the costs for provincial unions and competitions in the next three years.
''Like all those involved in rugby, we have been greatly encouraged by the public's reaction to the Air New Zealand Cup in 2009. The strong growth in television audiences and the visibility of the competition were hugely positive. Together with our provincial unions we now need to figure out how we can harness that interest and support in 2010 and beyond to sustain those teams and these vital competitions over the longer term,'' Tew said.
A meeting of all 14 Premier Division provincial unions CEOs and the CEOs of Wanganui and Mid-Canterbury was held in Wellington today to further discuss these issues.
- © Fairfax NZ News
Sponsored links
NZRFU realy turned yellow with this one - promotion/relegation is great for any competition and keeps it interesting right til the end and and the only reason last years NPC was the best for ages. Teams fighting for survival is just as interesting and intriguing as teams battling it out at the top just look at the english premiership with newcastle getting relegated, st james stadium was packed to the rafters with fans til the very last game. im currently based in europe and its becoming ever increasingly obvious nz needs to grow a pair throughout its society
Thanks NZRFU and Steve Tew. I know its not the outcome you wanted, but this gives the provinces the opportunity to retain their players and continue their development. I'm sure next season will see an even more closely fought competition as the provinces continue to improve. The more even the competition the more unions have to fight for on the paddock, and thats good for rugby.
Without the ab's the anzc is just a 'b' competition and frankly aside from the little minnows of nz rugby no one else gives a toss about it so you can have whatever format you like. Don't believe me then look at how fans in the main centres stayed away in their droves. C'mon the super 14 and go the chiefs I say.
I also am a loyal Taranaki supporter but I certainly DONT agree with Naki supporter (ppl like him and that stupid dj that told us to boo @ the kicker at the harbour match give Taranakians a bad name) remembering we to both NLD & CM this year it was only the S15 proposal that saved us from the firing line. This is a good decision it mite bring support back for 2011
YEAR OF THE STAG
#62 - your comments are very short-sighted. Palmerston North may be the seventh largest city but just look at the population bases of teams that finished just above or below them. Dunedin - 115,000 approx, North Shore 225,000 approx, Manukau - close to 400,000. Should these teams not fall under the same ridiculous scrutiny you place Manawatu under? These unions have superior talent pools to choose from but performed more poorly than the Turbos this season.
The winner of the big match up:
Steve Tew VS Common Sense - Hooray COMMMON BLOODY SENSE prevails!!!!!
The facts don't lie.....
We the Rugby player, fan and supporter own this game not the NZRFU. Bring a CEO in who understands this. Too many reasons why not Steve and not enough reason why buddy. "Bring Back Buck" People watch the telly and go to the games and then we have the majority vote in these decisions.
Go the Naki .....and the Turbo's
mmato #62 where were the crowds? Well Manawatu has had decent sized crowds before this year. In fact since we were bought up we have had pretty good crowds all along. Why don't you harp on about Canterbury, Wellington etc. They are the teams who are a disgrace as far as crowd numbers go. Those teams are an embarrassment to the game in NZ. BTW did you see how many bonus points we had this season? We came close a number of times and played entertaining rugby in the process.
Agree with BK #73
Taranaki are not at all a bad team but Nakisupporter seems to have no idea what he is talking about. Equal with Tasman and Only a few points ahead of Manuwatu who had some awesome games against all teams. Not only that but all these teams bring in something different...except Taranaki. I have tried to avoid watching Taranaki games as they are just so boring! Such an overrated team. Finish the competition just as well as the so called "teams to be dropped" except the way they play their game is just so bad to watch. Forwards and booting the hell out of the ball.
From courtroom to big show for Harry Redknapp?
Black Caps win toss, opt to bat first
Full strength All Whites named to face Jamaica
World Cup All Blacks return for Crusaders
Stopping Tillman biggest buzz of SBW's career
Lydia Ko honoured with world No 1 medal
John O'Neill just misses top Man City job
Henry staying with NZRU to coach coaches
Rubin Statham named for Davis Cup singles
Bruno Senna follows late uncle Ayrton into F1
Fabio Capello quits as England football manager
Black Caps duelling for spots ahead of Proteas
CTV building collapse briefing for family
Killer's silence cost years in prison
PM Key's radio show referred to police
Police U-turn on speeding tolerance
Another ocean giant meets a tragic end
Kiwi game industry worth more than $179.6m
Week-long strike looms for port
Popular app's CEO apologises over privacy bungle
Lake Horowhenua toxic enough to kill a child
Armed gang members in Waitangi stand-off
World Cup All Blacks return for Crusaders
The price of love: $195 for Valentine's roses
Sir Bob Jones: SBW-Tillman fight a joke
Jaime Ridge ringside supporting Sonny Bill
Stopping Tillman biggest buzz of SBW's career
PM Key's radio show referred to police
Five aftershocks jolt Christchurch
Police U-turn on speeding tolerance
Hundreds lose money after trader dies
Police U-turn on speeding tolerance
Sir Bob Jones: SBW-Tillman fight a joke
Tillman KO'd by Sonny Bill Williams in first round
Deciphering the language of love
3D printing: saviour or piracy tool?
Gerry and Bob 'like a bickering couple'
PM Key's radio show referred to police
Newest First
Oldest First













Those few (and Tew/Hobbs) who criticize the actions of the four smaller provinces under threat should ask themselves this question...
If it was their team to be religated, would their local Union ignore their local community and allow themselves to be axed, or would they fight for their own local rugby and their community?
Bring on 2 pools of 7 teams for 2011. It fits the timing window. Simple eh!