Serena Williams' tennis tirade cops record fine

BY HOWARD FENDRICH
Last updated 11:40 01/12/2009
Serena Williams
AP
LOSING HER COOL: Serena Williams questions a call during her match against Kim Clijsters.

Related Links

Hunger the key for US Open champ Serena Serena in outburst to line judge in semifinal loss Serena Williams fined $14,000 for US Open tirade Serena earns spot in tennis Hall of Shame Controversial endings to grand slam matches Newspaper reaction to Serena losing her cool Serena Williams apologises for 'inappropriate outburst' Serena puts rant behind her

Relevant offers

Tennis

Azarenka rolls through to Qatar Open quarters Djokovic proud to receive Serbian honour Clijsters out of Indian Wells with injury Aussie tennis ace Tomic pleads not guilty Jones' entry proves bitter pill after defection Relegation looms for Kiwis in Davis Cup Croatia, Serbia, Austria into Davis Cup quarters Kiwis finish on a high with Davis Cup wins Woe for Federer as Swiss crash in Davis Cup New Zealand facing clean sweep in Davis Cup tie

Serena Williams has been fined a record NZ$115,000 for her tirade at a US Open line judge and could be suspended from that tournament if she has another "major offence" at any Grand Slam in the next two years.

Grand Slam administrator Bill Babcock's ruling was released this morning (NZ time), and he said Williams faces a "probationary period" at tennis' four major championships in 2010 and 2011. If she has another "major offence" at a Grand Slam tournament in that time, the fine would increase to US$175,000 and she would be barred from the following US Open.

"But if she does not have another offence in the next two years, the suspension is lifted," Babcock said in a telephone interview from London.

He said Williams is handing over US$82,500 right now to the Grand Slam committee, already nearly double the previous highest fine for a Grand Slam offence - about US$48,000 Jeff Tarango was docked in the 1990s.

Williams lashed out at a lineswoman after a foot-fault call at the end of her semifinal loss to eventual champion Kim Clijsters at the US Open in September.

"I am thankful that we now have closure on the incident and we can all move forward," Williams said in a statement released  by her publicist.

"I am back in training in preparation for next season and I continue to be grateful for all of the support from my fans and the tennis community."

She earned US$350,000 by reaching the US Open singles semifinals, part of her more than US$6.5 million in prize money in 2009, a single-season record for women's tennis. Her career prize money tops US$28 million.

The American is an 11-time Grand Slam singles champion and ended the 2009 season at No. 1 in the WTA rankings.

Williams' profanity-laced, finger-pointing outburst drew a US$10,000 fine from the US Tennis Association in September - the maximum onsite penalty a tennis player can face. But because it happened at a Grand Slam tournament, Babcock was charged with investigating whether further punishment was merited.

He concluded that Williams violated the "major offence" rule for "aggravated behaviour." The Grand Slam committee - with one representative from each of the sport's four major championships, including USTA president Lucy Garvin - approved his decision Sunday (NZ time).

Ad Feedback

"As a voting member of the Grand Slam committee, the USTA agrees with the additional penalties levied against Serena Williams for her on-court behaviour during her semifinal match at the 2009 US Open," the USTA said in a statement released to the AP. "The USTA looks forward to Ms Williams competing in the 2010 US Open."

Babcock said a "major offence" under Grand Slam rules is "any conduct that is determined to be the 'major offence' of 'aggravated behavior' or 'conduct detrimental to the game.'" There is no specific definition of what sort of actions constitute a "major offence."

He said the highest possible fine that Williams could face - US$175,000, if she violates her Grand Slam probation - was chosen because it is the difference in winnings between reaching the quarterfinals and semifinals at the US Open. The $10,000 Williams already was docked by the USTA will be counted toward that total; that's why she is paying half of $165,000 now.

During the September 12 match at Flushing Meadows, the foot fault - a call rarely, if ever, made at that stage of such a significant match - resulted in a double-fault for Williams, moving Clijsters one point from victory.

Williams paused, retrieved a ball to serve again and then stopped. She stepped toward the official, screaming, cursing and shaking the ball at her. Williams was penalised a point for that display. It happened to come on match point, ending the semifinal with Clijsters ahead 6-4, 7-5.

- AP

25 comments
Post a comment
Alfred Rosenberg   #25   07:29 am Dec 02 2009

#15 "Not only must they grin and bare incompetent line calls but hostile crowds as well" #22 "American's blatantly cheer for tennis players from other countries rather than cheer for Serena and Venus." That idea must come from her match with Kim Clijsters where she was booed. Some of the crowd was booing because they turned up to a previous game to see Serena play her sister Venus and Serena unexpectedly pulled out of the match 4 minutes before it started. Those booing fans turned up to see Serena play Venus. If they were trying to boo black players out of tennis, they wouldnt show up to watch two black women play and they wouldnt have been so disappointed that they didnt play.

Alfred Rosenberg   #24   01:27 am Dec 02 2009

1. I disagree about it being only about the foot fault call because she threw her racket earlier in the game. 2. I just listened to some youtube videos of her matches and I only heard cheering for Serena not booing.

Get It Right   #23   04:52 pm Dec 01 2009

So she is black - so what. (Pull your head in #16!! It's people like you who live in the past keeping this sort of environment alive). So the call was or was not correct - so what. So she had an outburst - so what. Understandable when the pressure is on. Even the great Federer has let loose now and again - especially in his early career. The whole point of this is the degree, content and delivery of her rage to the lineswoman. She swore at her, threatened her, stood over her while she sat in her chair to initimidate her. Now you take her place in that chair...different story now isn't it. Stick to the facts of why she was fined, not your emotion.

Serena NO.1   #22   04:49 pm Dec 01 2009

Alfred Rosenberg do you even watch Tennis? Obviously not or you wouldn't talk so much tripe! American's blatantly cheer for tennis players from other countries rather than cheer for Serena and Venus. The racism that has been directed at these 2 amazing athletes is well documented throughout there careers and is commented on by the commentators in almost every match they play. EVERY game they get shockingly bad decisions by lines people and umpires (most memorable when Jennifer Capriati the all American White Girl had 3 balls go miles over the line but was given the points to ensure she was gift wrapped the match) the Williams sisters ALMOST never complain and both sisters are more gracious in defeat than ANY other female player. You can't compare tennis to other sports as tennis is just in a different class it is a sport dominated by the upper class and here came along 2 black girls with from "the streets" and they take the tennis world by storm and the tennis association could do nothing but stand back and watch and they are still spewing!

Paul   #21   03:27 pm Dec 01 2009

Tudamax 15. What a load of racial paranoia garbage. Wasn't the game played in the Arthur Ashe stadium....named after one of the most universally admired tennis champions of all time. I like Serena Williams, but she made a real ass of herself that day and deserved everything she got.

Stephen   #20   02:14 pm Dec 01 2009

#16 If the lineswoman had been wide awake and not called the foot fault in the first place, Serena wouldn't have had to do anything. She wouldn't have gotten angry like she did and would have lost the match in any case. Kim was playing the better tennis.

Alfred Rosenberg   #19   01:49 pm Dec 01 2009

Tudamax #15 - you pulled the race card and got everything backwards as is usual when that card is pulled.

You say white people think tennis should be dominated by English gentry. Times have changed. I doubt if white people care about the William's success in tennis. Blacks are supposed to dominate in sport in 2009 after all - look at how American football, Rugby, Rugby League, Basketball, Baseball and Soccer teams are all dominated by non-whites in majority white countries. If it was the other way around non-whites would be demanding the teams be more proportionate.

Just like the famous Springbok tour when everybody cared about the Sth Africa rugby team being all white when nobody cared that the Sth Africa soccer team was all black.

Maybe Serena couldnt handle that the pretty white blonde was winning and that's why she spat the dummy. Just like Kanye West jumping all over Taylor Swift because he thought a black person should have got the award for her rubbish song - not the first times he's done it either.

Im starting to see a pattern here - when white people are racist its white racism. When non-white people are racist its also white racism. When non-white people fail its white racism. When non-white people get caught out its white racism. When non-white people dont get their way its white racism.

When I studied psychology they called that "Freudian projection bias"

Jon   #18   01:24 pm Dec 01 2009

tudamax

Bit of a bee in the bonnet

CRAIG   #17   01:16 pm Dec 01 2009

$100000 fine for being right, what the fudge is going on. the same open that she was screwed over before good old land of the free at it again.

AT   #16   11:56 am Dec 01 2009

Serena Williams would not be fined, if she had requested a replay of the relevant video at a US Open.


Show 1-15 of 25 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content