READER REPORT:

Ditch royals and their ugly past

MICHAEL KUMOVE
Last updated 11:30 15/11/2012
Queen
SUPPLIED

DIAMOND JUBILEE: The Coronation Theatre, Westminster Abbey: Portrait of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, 2012 by Ralph Heimans.

Related Links

Crowd goes wild for Prince Charles and Camilla Does NZ need the royal family? Prince Charles thrown a capital party

Relevant offers

Stuff Nation

Renter and home owner: two worlds collide West coast photos to blow you away Insider secrets to scoring sweet deals Pet of the day: Santa's little helper Top five reader comments of the day How can we end the cycle of family violence? Have you wwoofed around the world? Trick of the light to showcase Auckland Santa screams turn to squeals of delight Reeling in the reasons why NZ is the best

OPINION: Staggering, isn't it? You, an ordinary New Zealander, are controlled by a strange-talking little old woman on the other side of the world.

On paper, she can do with you as she sees fit - dissolve your parliament, revoke your laws and fire your prime minister, who serves ''at Her Majesty's pleasure''.

We are her subjects, her playthings - subjugated, dominated.

Of course - as any monarchist will be quick to point out - she doesn't really exercise these powers in reality. New Zealand's unwritten constitutional conventions dictate that our Parliament is sovereign and the monarch is a mere figurehead. Why should it matter if she's there, then?

It matters because symbols matter. True, the Queen has almost no actual power, but she is the symbol of everything New Zealanders loathe: elitism, colonialism, tyranny.

The British monarchs spent hundreds of years brutally attacking countries across the globe and massacring untold numbers of people in their quest for ever-greater domination.

Shouldn't we be leaping at the chance to distance ourselves from Britain and its monstrous history? Removing the monarchy as soon as practicable would be the best way to go about this, since our retention of it is essentially a tacit endorsement of New Zealand's British past.

Like any symbolic change, this would have no real effect on anyone's life. But don't be fooled. Symbolic changes still matter very much. I doubt many New Zealanders would be supportive of changing the term "Queen" to "Führer", even though this too would be a purely symbolic change.

So, getting rid of the monarchy isn't going to have a substantial effect on any individual's life. But it will do something just as important: by changing the symbols we use to define ourselves a nation, moving to a republic will spur the development of a new collective identity which reflects modern-day New Zealand - diverse, egalitarian and democratic.

As long as we retain the monarchy, our growth as a nation will be forever stunted.


View all contributions
Ad Feedback

Comments

Special offers
Opinion poll

Can the Black Caps win the World Cup?

Yes

No

It's too early to say

I hate cricket

Vote Result

Related story: (See story)

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content