READER REPORT:

TV being spoilt by choice

NICHOLAS LOOMANS
Last updated 05:00 23/11/2012

Relevant offers

Stuff Nation

A much-needed home for Nero Manchester City face stern test of EPL title credentials against Liverpool Pet of the day: The shredder Post-earthquake Christchurch 'occupied territory' Top five reader comments today Family came first, then came the battle to find work The greatest animal escapes Your epic driving test fails Pet of the day: Ozzy the entertainer Weather photo of the week: Feb 27, 2015

I think with the abundance of channels TV has watered itself down too much to be a viable source of nightly entertainment.

I follow maybe, at my peak, five shows, which gives me an hour a night spread out over a week's viewing. 

When you have three or four channels you can show decent stuff most of the time and cater to most people. But as channels grow in numbers, the quality content available isn't really meeting the demand and therefore more filler shows (which seem to be reality shows and talent shows at the moment) are created to justify having those channels for people to spend their money on.

With fewer channels you can put up with some fluff; you maybe watch a show you love, a show you enjoy but wouldn't record and a show just because nothing else is on at that time. With 100 channels the good stuff gets lost and you just end up seeing brain rot most of the time.

New Zealand is in an advantageous position in that we can see what is happening to American TV and we can stop it happening here.

We need to tighten up the schedules, reduce channels, improve the payment model (al la carte, anyone?) to keep relevance as we move ever towards an over-the-internet society.

Ad Feedback

Comments

Special offers
Opinion poll

Would you send your child to a total immersion school of another culture?

Yes

No

No opinion

Vote Result

Related story: (See story)

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content