READER REPORT:

TV being spoilt by choice

NICHOLAS LOOMANS
Last updated 05:00 23/11/2012

Relevant offers

Stuff Nation

Top five reader comments of the day Is Auckland's franchise singing the Blues? An idea to 'change our society for good' You don't have to live like a student to save This is how we can make our roads safer Are your pets bessie mates? Preparation over skill gives ABs the edge Giving an animal in need new life From hand to mouth to homeowner Imagining the tension filling the night sky

I think with the abundance of channels TV has watered itself down too much to be a viable source of nightly entertainment.

I follow maybe, at my peak, five shows, which gives me an hour a night spread out over a week's viewing. 

When you have three or four channels you can show decent stuff most of the time and cater to most people. But as channels grow in numbers, the quality content available isn't really meeting the demand and therefore more filler shows (which seem to be reality shows and talent shows at the moment) are created to justify having those channels for people to spend their money on.

With fewer channels you can put up with some fluff; you maybe watch a show you love, a show you enjoy but wouldn't record and a show just because nothing else is on at that time. With 100 channels the good stuff gets lost and you just end up seeing brain rot most of the time.

New Zealand is in an advantageous position in that we can see what is happening to American TV and we can stop it happening here.

We need to tighten up the schedules, reduce channels, improve the payment model (al la carte, anyone?) to keep relevance as we move ever towards an over-the-internet society.

Ad Feedback

Comments

Special offers
Opinion poll

Which reader's plan would you support?

Arturo Pelayo - Community uses for vacant lots

Nick Teulon - Incentives to swap cars for bikes

Bruce Roberts - Educational support for Pasifika children

Vote Result

Related story: (See story)

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content