Do we need the royals? For stability and balance

Last updated 12:00 19/02/2013
Queen Elizabeth is unlikely to abdicate.
Getty Images
ROYAL RULE: Should New Zealand replace Queen Elizabeth as our head of state?

Related Links

Does NZ need the royal family? If not the royal family, then who? Do we need the royals? Let the people choose Do we need the royals? If it ain't broke ... Royals like old extended family Does NZ need the royals? Where are our royalties? Do we need the royals? Part of our identity Do we need to royals? Time to farewell the monarchy

Relevant offers

I'm a royalist, even though it seems the royal family seems to contribute nothing to New Zealand, nor in fact the lives of Kiwis. But the royal family deos have an almost hidden, yet important, part to play, which money can never replace: Stability and balance.

Historically, most countries who have got rid of royalty in order to be fully democratic have been embroiled in civil war before any form of stability is reached and it's something I genuinely fear in this country.

I hear countless voices shouting it could never happen here, but really? Who would select who would initially lead us? European New Zealanders will dilly-dally and want a top businessman with lots of money in charge; Maori will want to have their leader in charge; Greens will want an extreme left-winger to guide us through to protect the environment; other races' calls will never be heard as media won't publish their views, and so on.

It'll cause so much division and distrust that the monarchy is not worth tossing out for the sake of Kiwis' so-called democracy which, I might add, already exists. Why fix something that isn't broken, however fallible it may appear to some?

It's truly not worth it.

View all contributions
Ad Feedback


Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content