Red Wedding as Labour MPs restate vows to party
FROM THE LEFTCHRIS TROTTER
OPINION: It was one of the most shocking episodes in television history. Those who had not read George R R Martin's Game of Thrones watched with rising horror and disbelief as a large percentage of the television series' most sympathetic characters were brutally butchered.
Not for nothing was House Frey's massacre of Robb and Catelyn Stark, Robb's pregnant wife, and 3500 of House Stark's loyal bannermen dubbed "the Red Wedding".
Nor was Martin forced to rely solely upon his (excessively?) bloodthirsty imagination when writing this memorable scene.
History furnishes many grim precedents for the all- encompassing massacre of political rivals.
Nearly 1600 years ago the Anglo- Saxon chieftains Hengist and Horsa invited Vortigen and his Romano-British supporters to a great feast to celebrate the pact of peace that their two warring armies had just concluded.
But, unbeknown to their guests, the Saxons had concealed daggers in the soles of their boots, and at the cry "nima der sexa!" - "bring out the knives" - Hengist's and Horsa's men fell upon their 300 weaponless guests and slew them.
This terrible betrayal of the ancient laws of hospitality was remembered as "the Night of the Long Knives" - a name which, 1500 years later, was joined to the equally bloody purge of Adolf Hitler's political rivals on the night of June 30, 1934.
Inevitably, there will be some who reach for the "Red Wedding" or "Night Of The Long Knives" metaphors to describe the (readily predictable) demotion of a handful of newly- elected Labour leader David Cunliffe's bitterest caucus opponents.
In the five days since his decisive first-ballot win on Sunday, four of Mr Cunliffe's most formidable adversaries - Trevor Mallard, Chris Hipkins, Darien Fenton and his principal rival for the leadership, Grant Robertson - have lost their jobs.
Not so many casualties, really - and none of them the least bit surprising. Into each change of leadership a little blood must fall.
The real Red Wedding occasioned by Mr Cunliffe's triumph has been the restatement of the marriage vows binding Labour's parliamentary contingent to the wider party organisation.
The two had been growing apart for years - to the point where following last year's annual conference a divorce seemed imminent. What rescued the partnership? The party's rule changes.
In the past, the newly-elected MP's primary political focus had been the relationship he or she enjoyed (or endured) with his or her caucus colleagues.
These were, after all, the people who could push an ambitious MP up the greasy poll of politics - or keep him down.
But now, thanks to the new rules, Labour MPs not only need to remain on good terms with their caucus colleagues, but they also need to further the policy objectives of the party's rank and file, and address the needs of its affiliated trade union members.
This reaffirmation of the bonds between the party and its MPs may yet prompt a larger and much more important reconnection.
For most of its history New Zealand has been defined by the achievements of two great progressive political parties: the Liberals and Labour. The century- long quest for security and equality which they began so enthralled the New Zealand electorate that not even the Liberals' or Labour's political opponents dared to step outside, or challenge, the over-arching social consensus they had fashioned.
Certainly, only Labour enjoyed the popular trust and confidence required to establish a regime whose steady elaboration would not only shatter that consensus but open up a vast gulf between the labour movement and New Zealanders' progressive instincts. What's more, the fourth Labour government's embrace of neoliberal economics freed the Right of New Zealand politics from the constraints of a consensus which had drawn its teeth and blunted its claws.
One of the principal enablers of Labour's treachery was the parliamentary caucus' essential autonomy from the party and, by extension, the people the party was founded to represent. With no need to heed the will of the party, the personally and politically ambitious were able to go on exploiting Labour's key institutional weakness.
Not any more.
The Labour Party's recent constitutional reforms allow the rank and file membership to put a collar on caucus-centred ambition. And now they've elected themselves a leader determined to reacquaint the party not only with the broader labour movement, but also with the progressive yearnings of a battered New Zealand electorate.
A very "red" wedding indeed.
- Taranaki Daily News
How many hours of sleep, on average, do you get per day/night?Related story: Sleep-deprived putting their health at risk