NZ First has some serious thinking to do. As the National Party's electoral support continues to erode (to 43 per cent in the latest Roy Morgan poll) Winston Peters' political options become decisive.
Only NZ First is positioned to pivot between Labour and National in 2014. The Greens' abhorrence of National's second- term policies has shackled them to the Left in ways which Labour is beginning to find unnerving.
No less than John Key, David Shearer must be calculating the price of securing NZ First's support in two years.
But if Mr Peters is guided by experience, the choice between Labour and National will be simple. Mr Key's second-term Government is an unashamedly neo-liberal affair and a very uncomfortable fit with NZ First's nationalistic populism.
To win mass support, NZ First must tack to the Left, not the Right.
That a turn to the Left is the best choice he could make may not be immediately apparent to a classical conservative like Mr Peters.
The National Party was where he won his political spurs and, like a young man's first love, will always enjoy a special place in his heart.
But, as Mr Peters is fond of pointing out, the National Party of John Key is not the party of Sir Keith Holyoake or Sir Robert Muldoon.
They were what social historian Chris Harris calls 'Red Tories': conservative politicians who fear the social division and disintegration which unfettered capitalism inevitably produces.
Because working- class men and women have scant reason to support an economic system that lashes them for being poor, the Red Tory believes it's in capitalism's long-term interests to guarantee every citizen a reasonable standard of comfort. Like Mr Peters himself, they subscribe to the 'One Nation' conservatism of the 19th century British statesman, Benjamin Disraeli, striving to bring all classes together in all- inclusive nationalism.
But if Mr Peters is serious about putting capitalism on a leash, he must acknowledge the primacy of politics over economics. Yet that is something his potential allies in Mr Key's National Party will never tolerate. The prime minister and his colleagues are all free market men: 'Blue Tories' who put economics first, and whose unwavering belief in an unfettered capitalism leaves no room at all for the Red Tories' heavy-handed regulation and protectionism.
Any coalition agreement which made provision for such economic heresies would, like the National- NZ First coalition agreement of 1996, be broken in quick time.
Labour offers NZ First much better prospects. Reading the speeches of Davids Shearer, Parker and Cunliffe, it is clear Labour still favours a 'New Zealand Incorporated' approach to economic management.
Equally clearly, however, they're unwilling to admit that such a policy would also necessitate putting politics ahead of economics.
As a concept, NZ Inc pre- supposes that it is possible for all the factors of production to be brought together for the purposes of generating a healthy national dividend - payable to every citizen. That this would involve some form of economic planning and some sort of mechanism for ensuring everybody stuck to the plan smacks too much of socialism for today's Labour politicians' comfort. They would prefer the capitalists to simply fall in with Labour's plans voluntarily, because they represent sound economic sense.
Since this is about as likely as Paula Bennett authorising a Christmas bonus for solo mums, Labour's 'Blue Socialists' and NZ First's Red Tories should be encouraged to embrace the primacy of politics together.
Mr Peters and his colleagues will have to lead the way, because only by demonstrating the Red Tory populists' power to mobilise the non-vote will Labour be persuaded to step out of its 'No, no, we're responsible economic managers' comfort zone and take the fight to the Blue Tory defenders of free-market economic orthodoxy.
The beauty of a Labour-NZ First coalition for those capitalists capable of taking the long view, is that it asks nothing more of them than a willingness to admit that they too are a part of the nation and that, like every other citizen, they have responsibilities as well as rights.
It's a simple proposition: For capitalism to function effectively in New Zealand it must be acknowledged that there will be times when, to preserve social cohesion and deliver social justice, people must come first and money second.
- © Fairfax NZ News
What's your view of sand mining?Related story: Environmental group urges mining fight
with Rachel Stewart
Matt Rilkoff's perspective of contemporary life
with Gordon Brown
With Kathryn Calvert
The self-confessed bard of Brixton, offers views on life, politics and Akubra hats.
with Glenn McLean