Google opposes new copyright law
BY TOM PULLAR-STRECKER
Related Links
Relevant offers
Google has voiced its opposition to a controversial law change that would force internet service providers to cut off "repeat copyright infringers, in appropriate circumstances".
In a submission to the Telecommunications Carriers Forum, an industry body, Google said section 92a of the Copyright Act would undermine the "incredible social and economic benefits" of the internet and was disproportionate to the problem it aimed to address.
TelstraClear appeared to deliver a death blow to the law change last week when it said it would not support the development of a code being drafted by the forum that attempted to set out how telcos could interpret their obligations under the act.
Spokesman Mathew Bolland said section 92a which is due to come into force on March 27 was a bad law that wouldn't work and had caused unprecedented customer concern.
Forum chief executive Ralph Chivers said TelstraClear's decision meant the forum could not formally ratify a code, since the industry body required unanimity from its members, which includes all the major telcos. But he said the forum would continue to work with its other members and the recording industry to flesh out an informal code that internet providers could adopt if they chose, should section 92a come into force. It would see copyright infringers disconnected after a series of warnings, with a possible right of appeal to an independent arbiter.
A spokesman for Commerce Minister Simon Power said the Government had been advised meaningful progress on a code was still being made. "If TelstraClear wants to be excluded from that arrangement, that is their choice." The Government reserved the right to look at the issue again.
Google accused the forum of dressing up its proposed enforcement scheme as an "education" exercise and said it was important that any code the forum came up with made it clear that there could be others ways for ISPs to comply with the law.
Sky Television said that ISPs should cut off copyright infringers sooner than the forum had proposed.
- © Fairfax NZ News
Sponsored links
NZ police access Facebook evidence
Facebook can alienate people further - study
Brazil files injunction against Twitter
Review: Catherine for Xbox 360
Top selling games in New Zealand
Apple factory hacked amid global activist stunt
Megaupload co-accused speaks out
Direct-to-fans sport still 'years away'
The Artist dog wins 'spokesdog' role
Kiwi game industry worth more than $179.6m
Shops evacuated in Christchurch mall
One dead after Hawke's Bay crash
Man missing after Harbour Bridge fall
World Press Photo of the Year chosen
Teen window cleaner stable after fall
Danny Lee drops back at Pebble Beach
Obama tries to defuse birth control fight
Police recapture Madonna stalker
Promoter dismisses bike helmet harm study
Will bill make food safer or be a form of control?
Quakes blow Wellington's benchmark
EU courts Kiwis for science grants
Earthquakes shake north and south of NZ
Quakes blow Wellington's benchmark
Author, 12, gives proceeds to cancer research
Baby murder-accused sobs, sniffles in court
Plucky mother intent on recovery
NZ police access Facebook evidence
Shops evacuated in Christchurch mall
A burning issue: When coffins get too big
Helmet law halves cyclist numbers
Top selling games in New Zealand
Old trains more reliable than new Matangi


