Times are a'-charging for web news
BY JULIAN LEE
Relevant offers
Newspaper publishers have given the first indication of how they plan to charge people for reading news online with one of the world's best-known newspapers,The Times of London, to offer an ''all-you-can-eat'' package to readers.
By the northern hemisphere spring, web users will have access to the newspaper's website as part of their general subscription fee or pay a fee to download as many stories as they like during a 24-hour period, the editor of The Times revealed.
The comments effectively end speculation that News Corp - the publisher of The Times - will adopt a model similar to iTunes where casual users pay to read per article.
The editor of The Times, James Harding, argued that model could also undermine quality journalism.
''You have to be very careful with article-only economics. You will find yourself writing a lot more about Britney Spears and a lot less about Tamils in northern Sri Lanka,'' Mr Harding was quoted in The Guardian as telling an industry conference in England.
Executives at News Limited - the Australian publishing arm of News Corp - remained coy about plans to follow The Times. Sydney, along with London and New York, has a team investigating pricing plans.
A spokesman for News's online arm, News Digital Media, said: "We have no plans to start charging for content in the first quarter of next year. The pricing model discussed in the United Kingdom is not necessarily what we will be doing here. We have yet to finalise our plans.''
Other publishers, including Fairfax Media, the publisher of the Herald, are waiting to see what will happen to audiences when the ''pay walls'' are erected. While business newspapers such as The Wall Street Journal - also owned by News - have a million paying subscribers, few commentators believe people will pay for general news, which accounts for the majority of readership online.
The chief executive of Fairfax, Brian McCarthy, said advertising sold on Fairfax websites remained its main business model.
''Charging users of these general news sites for access may not be profitable for us in the long term,'' he told shareholders at the company's annual general meeting this month.
Renee Barnes, a lecturer in online journalism at RMIT, was doubtful that Australian web browsers - many of whom were young and used to not paying for content - would change their habits.
''People have quite clearly said that they won't pay for Facebook and yet we are expecting them to pay for news.''
- © Fairfax NZ News
Sponsored links
Bulgaria could suspend vote on ACTA
Internet in Iran severely disrupted as elections loom
Review: The Darkness 2 for Xbox 360
Nasdaq website disrupted by online attacks
Angry Birds join Facebook, hope for 800M likes
Activists hacked McCully's emails
Spoof Qantas Twitter account shut down
Preview: Total War: Fall of the Samurai
Chinese iPads seized in trademark dispute
Guinness' all time greatest game ending
Timberlake helps bring glory back to MySpace
Earthquake stress blamed for murder
Reconsider Crafar farms deal, Government told
Search for missing yachtie to be reviewed
Mojo Mathers gives maiden speech
Top-12 teams for Tall Ferns late Olympic bid
Proteas start tour with T20 win over Wizards
NZ dollar up on strong retail spending
Should you take your groom's name?
Auckland, Wellington expensive for expats
Matt Giteau still simmering over Deans snub
Woman jailed for spiking smoothie with antifreeze
Earthquake stress blamed for murder
Can Paris Hilton save her image?
Should you take your groom's name?
Gareth Morgan: I hope Norwegian sinks
Matt Giteau still simmering over Deans snub
Proteas start tour with T20 win over Wizards
Adele's ex-boyfriend deserves credit
Should you take your groom's name?
Man fined for selling derogatory clothing
iPads make learning a delight for pupils
'Legal cocaine' may be new designer drug
Tapanui farm dog becomes Lotto dog


