Hands-free mobile plan 'false security'
Relevant offers
Motorists will continue to die for a phone call because a proposed ban on cellphone use while driving does not go far enough, an injury researcher says.
Canadian Louis Francescutti, a safety advocate, said the Government would fail drivers if it allowed them to continue using hands-free cellphones while banning them from using hand-held devices.
His comments come as a study shows that motorists who use cellphones while driving are four to six times more likely to be involved in a crash, and that cellphone use slows drivers' reaction time by 18 percent.
"The worst thing the Government could do is only ban hand-helds," he told The Dominion Post yesterday from Edmonton.
"It gives people a false sense of security. There is absolutely no difference between hand-held and hands-free devices."
Transport Ministry officials are considering 56 submissions on a planned rule change that would make hand-held cellphone use illegal while driving. All 56 submissions - including those from Telecom, Vodafone and the AA - support a ban.
Recommendations are expected to be put to new Transport Minister Steven Joyce early next year. Those breaking the law would face a fine of $50 and 25 demerit points.
Drivers could still use hands-free devices, something many fear would undermine the ban's effectiveness. Both the Institution of Professional Engineers and the Motoring Writers' Guild backed a total ban in their submissions on the rule change.
Others said a total ban was unrealistic.
"A total ban on the use of hands-free devices ... would result in a significant impediment on business," the Insurance Council says in its submission.
Dr Francescutti, who recently spoke at a safety conference in Christchurch, said more than 200 studies highlighted the risks of driving while talking on a cellphone and that it was "equivalent to driving impaired".
In New Zealand, between 2002 and 2007 cellphone use was a contributing factor in at least 411 injury crashes and 26 deaths.
Politicians were slow to act on the matter, often because they used cellphones while driving.
"But if they are concerned about wait times in hospitals, healthcare costs, inefficiency and reducing injuries, this is one issue they should address."
- © Fairfax NZ News
Sponsored links
NZ police access Facebook evidence
Facebook can alienate people further - study
Brazil files injunction against Twitter
Review: Catherine for Xbox 360
Top selling games in New Zealand
Apple factory hacked amid global activist stunt
Megaupload co-accused speaks out
Direct-to-fans sport still 'years away'
The Artist dog wins 'spokesdog' role
Kiwi game industry worth more than $179.6m
Teens mimic depression to get prescription drugs
Calls for stronger leadership on suicide
Heartbreak for Football Ferns in US
Kiwis land big Aussie contract
Ryan Nelsen debuts in Tottenham win
England fight back to edge Italy in Six Nations
Suarez a 'disgrace to Liverpool' in loss to United
Police arrest five at Murdoch's Sun newspaper
Oceania, Fifa roles end in disgrace
Cameron-Barrett to headline heavyweight night
Ethnic rights advice stuns communities
Dotcom accused van der Kolk 'flabbergasted'
Roll on 2050 - New Zealand economy to rise
Prison officers 'turned into mules'
Rugby joy short-lived, nation pessimistic
Helmet law halves cyclist numbers
Quake city assets set to be popular
CERA report prompts mall evacuation
Old trains more reliable than new Matangi
Prime Minister John Key wins hearts if not minds


