Social media differs to press - judge
Relevant offers
Digital living
The British judge presiding over a wide-ranging inquiry into media ethics and practices has suggested that social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter should be seen differently than traditional publishers.
Lord Justice Brian Leveson said Thursday that there was a distinction between what he described as "pub chatter" between friends on such sites and organisations which publish material for public consumption.
Leveson's inquiry was set up in the wake of Britain's phone hacking scandal and has the power to recommend far-reaching changes to the way the country's media are regulated.
The judge also is considering whether nontraditional forms of media, such as blogs, should be submitted to any eventual new rules.
- AP
Sponsored links
Apple co-founder to visit Auckland
Kiwis not up with online security
Death threat emails 'clearly a hoax'
Smartphones aiding identity theft
The rise of the adolescent CEOs
Year on: thinking back to February 22
Sky ponders shift to on-demand viewing
Best time for coffee? There's an app for that
Is our broadband really fried?
Carterton tragedy: Safety chief would refuse balloon ride
Major courts overhaul proposed
Foreign Affairs Ministry confirms 305 jobs to go
Mob cancels star's performance
Kiwis not up with online security
Helena Bonham Carter 'honoured'
New hope for kiwifruit growers
Gender non-conformity linked to abuse
Nelsen cleared to lead NZ against Jamaica
Robinson starts for Chiefs against old team
Man's childhood comic collection fetches $4.2m
Newest First
Oldest First