Technologist predicts cleaner internet

TOM PULLAR-STRECKER
Last updated 11:16 01/02/2012
Kevin Bermeister
Fairfax
FUTURAMA: Australian technologist Kevin Bermeister.

Relevant offers

Digital living

YouTube enlists Hollywood to attract youth Fry puts focus on data limits Tech-savvy police trial iPhones Where private chats linger on 'Find my phone' app thwarts would-be thieves Man sues Twitter over hate blog Microsoft's man who monitors privacy Email hacking managed well, says Key App turns iPhone into adult toy Internet in Iran severely disrupted as elections loom

The internet could be on the verge of a revolution as internet providers use new technology to filter out pirated material, child pornography and malware and buddy up with copyright owners to bolster their own revenues, an Australian technologist has forecast.

Kevin Bermeister, one of the original financial backers of Skype, said in a blog that technology sold by the likes of network equipment giants Cisco, Juniper and Huawei had developed to the point where it would be possible for internet providers to offer a "global file registry filter" that would reduce piracy and net nasties "to a very small problem".

Bermeister forecast internet providers might be willing to invest in the technology to filter the net if they could redirect customers' requests for pirated content to legitimate websites and earn a cut of music and movie sales.

That prospect might be shocking to some, he said. "However, the open internet was never much for loyalty, and internet providers, together with the world's largest copyright owners and media partners, may just have sufficient reason to be excited by the new world order in which the wild west days of the internet's early beginnings are nearing their end."

Cisco New Zealand managing director and former Microsoft New Zealand boss Geoff Lawrie said Bermeister's vision was technically feasible. "There is firewall software now that can look at the nature of internet traffic and you could write a filter program that made decisions based on that."

But he believed it was a novel theory, rather than the likely direction of the internet. Internet providers in New Zealand, at least, had always been "fervently hands-off", he said.

"They are absolutely, passionately committed to avoiding putting themselves in a position of liability, and that is what would be implied by them stepping up to a filter."

Ad Feedback

- © Fairfax NZ News

51 comments
Post a comment
joe   #51   09:53 am Feb 02 2012

These internet regulators should just use the child porn excuse for everything. That wins every time. Even the most open internet activists won't ask any questions, they will just be like, "well, if it's to stop child porn, then I guess it's okay."

Max   #50   09:38 am Feb 02 2012

People keep talking about workarounds and the like.

Yes the technology is there, encryption which isn't viable to crack, overseas servers offering up IP addresses not linked to you, VPN's and all that.

The problem is that all these can be defeated, and easily, because the government can just make laws to get around them.

Encrypt you're traffic... Make a law saying you can't use encryption... If that is going to far, just make a law that everybody has to hand over the keys o. Demand by the court (not sure about us, but so e countries already have it). Say they have no right to demand my keys, nope, easy, even without deep-packet I section, you can still monitor traffic shapes to come up with enough probable course to request keys, and if you refuse, you are in contempt of court, which would probably cost more tha. Than the copyright infringements.

Nope, if the government really wanted to stop it, they could, it's just they'd take a lot of flack, so it won't happen unless the copyright lobbiets come up with a big enough bribe to cover the flack... Or the US demands it in return for free trade etc.

happyfeet   #49   07:32 am Feb 02 2012

so the technologists predicts that the future internet will be censored by governments like the great fire wall of china. that is a horrible thought. the entire success of the internet is based on the fact that its a computer network the allows the free and open exchange of information. i bet you this guy has no real understanding of technology but he owns a mac and writes a blog and thinks hes a tech god. pfft off.

fyi we have this sort of filter hardware at work and its really easy to get around it.

-suppressed-   #48   06:28 am Feb 02 2012

The details of any person commenting against total corporate censorship of the internet will be filtered out by laws made by Johnny 'The Smiling Assassin' Key and forwarded to the appropriate authorities.

You have been warned.

All Hail The CEO! Earthcorp forever! Freedom is Slavery! Yeah!

Frederick   #47   09:51 pm Feb 01 2012

We've already had laws drafted by the Labour government on behalf of the US media corporations. (Clare Curran even wants to investigate charging all internet users a levy, which is given to the NZ recording industry.)

Now we're staging immense raids with helicopters and shutting down websites because the US government tells us to, despite no evidence of guilt.

The MPAA and RIAA want to destroy the internet. I like the internet much more than I like the songs the manufacture. If I had to chose a world without Six60 and Annabel Fay, than a world without YouTube, Wikipedia, and the billions of sites on the internet.

Ogre   #46   08:29 pm Feb 01 2012

rampant free speech and other "net nasties" replaced with corporations and governments ability to filter your media further

Rhys   #45   05:56 pm Feb 01 2012

This is a terrible idea. Hes a banker not a technologist.

Davis   #44   05:39 pm Feb 01 2012

"world's largest copyright owners and media partners, may just have sufficient reason to be excited by the new world order in which the wild west days of the internet's early beginnings are nearing their end."

Yes, no doubt. The internet has been a giant thorn in the foot for these groups who have held onto control for so long. I'm not talking about piracy, but how the internet and user generated content has to some degree made them irrelevant.

Suddenly people are free of tv, radio, newspapers, magazines and their respective media conglomerates. Free to seek out or produce content themselves and promote/discuss it among themselves.

Now, we can't have that now can we.

DD   #43   04:54 pm Feb 01 2012

Can we agree never to publish this guy anywhere again?

Bezz   #42   04:54 pm Feb 01 2012

Everything for free on the internet, as it was and always will be. If you want to force control or cost on to people why don't you go away and make your own internet - don't try to hijak ours !!!


Show 1-41 of 51 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content