Technologist predicts cleaner internet
TOM PULLAR-STRECKER
Relevant offers
Digital living
The internet could be on the verge of a revolution as internet providers use new technology to filter out pirated material, child pornography and malware and buddy up with copyright owners to bolster their own revenues, an Australian technologist has forecast.
Kevin Bermeister, one of the original financial backers of Skype, said in a blog that technology sold by the likes of network equipment giants Cisco, Juniper and Huawei had developed to the point where it would be possible for internet providers to offer a "global file registry filter" that would reduce piracy and net nasties "to a very small problem".
Bermeister forecast internet providers might be willing to invest in the technology to filter the net if they could redirect customers' requests for pirated content to legitimate websites and earn a cut of music and movie sales.
That prospect might be shocking to some, he said. "However, the open internet was never much for loyalty, and internet providers, together with the world's largest copyright owners and media partners, may just have sufficient reason to be excited by the new world order in which the wild west days of the internet's early beginnings are nearing their end."
Cisco New Zealand managing director and former Microsoft New Zealand boss Geoff Lawrie said Bermeister's vision was technically feasible. "There is firewall software now that can look at the nature of internet traffic and you could write a filter program that made decisions based on that."
But he believed it was a novel theory, rather than the likely direction of the internet. Internet providers in New Zealand, at least, had always been "fervently hands-off", he said.
"They are absolutely, passionately committed to avoiding putting themselves in a position of liability, and that is what would be implied by them stepping up to a filter."
- © Fairfax NZ News
Sponsored links
People keep talking about workarounds and the like.
Yes the technology is there, encryption which isn't viable to crack, overseas servers offering up IP addresses not linked to you, VPN's and all that.
The problem is that all these can be defeated, and easily, because the government can just make laws to get around them.
Encrypt you're traffic... Make a law saying you can't use encryption... If that is going to far, just make a law that everybody has to hand over the keys o. Demand by the court (not sure about us, but so e countries already have it). Say they have no right to demand my keys, nope, easy, even without deep-packet I section, you can still monitor traffic shapes to come up with enough probable course to request keys, and if you refuse, you are in contempt of court, which would probably cost more tha. Than the copyright infringements.
Nope, if the government really wanted to stop it, they could, it's just they'd take a lot of flack, so it won't happen unless the copyright lobbiets come up with a big enough bribe to cover the flack... Or the US demands it in return for free trade etc.
so the technologists predicts that the future internet will be censored by governments like the great fire wall of china. that is a horrible thought. the entire success of the internet is based on the fact that its a computer network the allows the free and open exchange of information. i bet you this guy has no real understanding of technology but he owns a mac and writes a blog and thinks hes a tech god. pfft off.
fyi we have this sort of filter hardware at work and its really easy to get around it.
The details of any person commenting against total corporate censorship of the internet will be filtered out by laws made by Johnny 'The Smiling Assassin' Key and forwarded to the appropriate authorities.
You have been warned.
All Hail The CEO! Earthcorp forever! Freedom is Slavery! Yeah!
We've already had laws drafted by the Labour government on behalf of the US media corporations. (Clare Curran even wants to investigate charging all internet users a levy, which is given to the NZ recording industry.)
Now we're staging immense raids with helicopters and shutting down websites because the US government tells us to, despite no evidence of guilt.
The MPAA and RIAA want to destroy the internet. I like the internet much more than I like the songs the manufacture. If I had to chose a world without Six60 and Annabel Fay, than a world without YouTube, Wikipedia, and the billions of sites on the internet.
rampant free speech and other "net nasties" replaced with corporations and governments ability to filter your media further
This is a terrible idea. Hes a banker not a technologist.
"world's largest copyright owners and media partners, may just have sufficient reason to be excited by the new world order in which the wild west days of the internet's early beginnings are nearing their end."
Yes, no doubt. The internet has been a giant thorn in the foot for these groups who have held onto control for so long. I'm not talking about piracy, but how the internet and user generated content has to some degree made them irrelevant.
Suddenly people are free of tv, radio, newspapers, magazines and their respective media conglomerates. Free to seek out or produce content themselves and promote/discuss it among themselves.
Now, we can't have that now can we.
Can we agree never to publish this guy anywhere again?
Everything for free on the internet, as it was and always will be. If you want to force control or cost on to people why don't you go away and make your own internet - don't try to hijak ours !!!
Apple co-founder to visit Auckland
Kiwis not up with online security
Death threat emails 'clearly a hoax'
Smartphones aiding identity theft
The rise of the adolescent CEOs
Year on: thinking back to February 22
Sky ponders shift to on-demand viewing
Best time for coffee? There's an app for that
Is our broadband really fried?
Carterton tragedy: Safety chief would refuse balloon ride
Major courts overhaul proposed
Foreign Affairs Ministry confirms 305 jobs to go
Mob cancels star's performance
Kiwis not up with online security
Helena Bonham Carter 'honoured'
New hope for kiwifruit growers
Gender non-conformity linked to abuse
Nelsen cleared to lead NZ against Jamaica
Robinson starts for Chiefs against old team
Man's childhood comic collection fetches $4.2m
Carterton tragedy: Safety chief would refuse balloon ride
Mob cancels star's performance
Girl's three-hour punishment run fatal
Model ignores Victoria's Secret snub
Jennifer Aniston loves being lewd
Reviewer: Henry star of new show
Newest First
Oldest First
These internet regulators should just use the child porn excuse for everything. That wins every time. Even the most open internet activists won't ask any questions, they will just be like, "well, if it's to stop child porn, then I guess it's okay."