New privacy laws not safe enough, say pundits

KATE CHAPMAN
Last updated 05:00 10/04/2012

Relevant offers

Digital Living

Reports shows Russians hackers used Twitter, photos to breach US computers Will the Internet of Things listen to your private conversations? Computer coding could join education's 'three Rs' under Labour plan Google apologises after contractor threatens to remove gay bars from search engine Pluto shows public still fascinated by space as Nasa asks US government to restore funding Wellington university students take to social media to warn about crime Online romance seekers targets for international drug cartels New wi-fi service for Porirua CBD Snake selfie ends with $230,000 bill Hackers can be good for innovation

Some possible safeguards have been left out in proposed legislation under which private companies could get access to taxpayers' personal information.

The Privacy (Information Sharing) Bill reduces the threshold under which information can be disclosed if there is a risk to public health and safety or threat to the life or health of an individual.

It also allows the sharing of personal information between agencies if done in accordance with approved information-sharing agreements.

That could include disclosure to private firms or non-governmental organisations as well as between government departments.

Privacy Commissioner Marie Shroff said technological advances had made it easier to share information but without proper safeguards the Government risked losing New Zealanders' trust.

There were a number of "finely balanced" safeguards in the bill, but Ms Shroff said she would welcome more.

Private organisations were increasingly involved in the provision of public services and the line between public and private sectors was now "very thin".

"It's certainly an issue as to whether business should be allowed some access [to Government-held information] to a limited extent.

"That's exactly one of the concerns we have about this whole technology environment and the trend to use it and share it more widely, that it's the beginning, potentially, of a slippery slope."

Ms Shroff would be monitoring developments and making sure proposed sharing agreements were appropriate.

In its original review, the Law Commission made several recommendations that have not been adopted, including giving the privacy commissioner the power to conduct information audits and issue compliance notices.

Labour MP Charles Chauvel said he was concerned that not all the recommendations were adopted.

Civil Liberties Council spokesman Batch Hales was concerned, but not surprised, about the proposed legislation.

"Government is becoming more and more intrusive into people's privacy and closing out the public in all sorts of ways."

Ad Feedback

- The Dominion Post

Comments

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content