Pirates off the hook after 'third strikes' lapse

TOM PULLAR-STRECKER
Last updated 05:00 31/05/2012

Relevant offers

Digital Living

Google wants to know when users, tempted by an online advert, go to the shops Leaked: hundreds of internal Facebook documents on sex, violence, and terrorism Businessman's ransom nightmare at the hands of cyber hackers Instagram is the worst social network for young people's mental health Google's focus on AI means it will get even deeper into our lives Computer course helping 'digitally disadvantaged' saves ailing mother's family Online retail giants force NZ businesses to implement digital strategies Cyberattack hits at least 200,000 victims in 150 countries British researcher Marcus Hutchins finds kill switch, 'accidentally' stops malware crippling computers worldwide New Zealand upping digital security after 'massive' worldwide cyberattack

Two people who received "third strikes" for pirating music over the internet under the controversial "Skynet" copyright law have been let off the hook.

About 2000 infringement notice have been issued to internet users for piracy since the law, designed to combat illegal file sharing, took effect in September, telecommunications firms said. All were in response to requests from the Recording Industry Association of New Zealand (Rianz), which represents major record labels.

TelstraClear and Vodafone said in April that they had each issued third and final "enforcement notices" to customers, which meant Rianz could have brought either person before the Copyright Tribunal, where the maximum possible fine is $15,000.

However, the opportunity for Rianz to take action had now lapsed, a source confirmed.

TelstraClear issued the third-strike notice to its customer on April 12 and Vodafone's third strike was reported a week later.

Under the terms of the Copyright Act, Rianz had only 35 days after those dates – no later than last Thursday – to take either case to the tribunal.

A Justice Ministry spokesman said the Copyright Tribunal had not received any applications for enforcement action.

According to the act, the expiry date means all infringement notices issued to both customers are annulled and they will be back on a clean slate of "zero strikes".

Vodafone spokeswoman Michelle Baguley said last month that its customer was talking directly with Rianz after contacting Rianz through his or her own volition.

TelstraClear would have been obliged to forward details of its customer to the Copyright Tribunal only if Rianz had decided to take a case.

Ad Feedback

- The Dominion Post

Comments

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content