Google is altering its search results to de-emphasise the websites of repeat copyright offenders and make it easier to find legitimate providers of music, movies and other content.
The move is a peace offering to Hollywood and the music recording labels. This year, Google joined other Silicon Valley heavyweights to help kill legislation that would have given the United States government and content creators more power to shut down foreign websites that promote piracy.
The Motion Picture Association of America issued a lukewarm response, saying it was "optimistic" the change would help steer consumers away from piracy.
"We will be watching this development closely - the devil is always in the details," MPAA senior executive president Michael O'Leary said in a statement.
Next week, Google will start using "valid copyright removal notices" to rank its search results, according to a Friday blog post by Google's senior vice president of engineering, Amit Singhal.
Google typically ranks websites based on how many other sites link to them, on the belief that sites that get more links are more trustworthy and useful. But Google also regularly tweaks its formulas to reflect special circumstances.
In this case, sites with high numbers of copyright-removal notices may get bumped down in rankings. In effect, that will help users find legitimate sources of content without removing any pages from its results completely. Google did not elaborate on what it considers to be valid notices.
Google's icy relationship with content creators has thawed slightly.
Last month, Google said it would offer a US$50-per-month TV package over a super-fast fibre network in a Kansas City test bed. The package would offer mainstream channels including Viacom's Nickelodeon.
Google, which is based in Mountain View, California, also sells movies and music through its Google Play store on mobile devices that use its Android operating system.
But a US$1 billion copyright lawsuit filed by Viacom against Google's YouTube in 2007 was re-instated by a federal appeals court in April after a lower court threw it out.
And last week, court papers showed that the Authors Guild is demanding Google pay US$750 for each of the 20 million books it has scanned in a 7-year-old case.
- AP
Sponsored links
Comments
Steve Jobs' dream device is here
F--- yeah: Tumblr celebrates $1.1b deal
Neurotech industry puts its mind to games
District Health Board's website hacked
Jennifer Lopez to open cellphone stores
Dotcom puts legal defence costs at $62m
'Irrational' hackers are growing US security fear
Twitter adds security measure to logins
New Xbox elegant, but much unknown
London terror accused a 'shy' convert from Christianity
High commissioner paying $7500-a-week rent
Abuse claims at 'seriously dysfunctional' care home
Williams calls time on All Blacks career
Cockroaches drop the sweet tooth
Judges need a dash of X Factor
80-year-old breaks Everest record
The search for NZ's biggest pets
London terror victim's identity revealed
50-year-old 'fast pursuit' police coupe for sale
Royal couple in 'hairy' helicopter ride
Mystery buyer of Welly homes vanishes
Teen hangout pad concern for police
Maggot makes a meal of takeaway
London terror victim's identity revealed
South London attack a possible terrorism act
Williams calls time on All Blacks career
Royal couple in 'hairy' helicopter ride
Are you happy with the Facebook News Feed redesign?
