Facebook tries to settle privacy lawsuit again

DAN LEVINE
Last updated 13:33 16/11/2012

Relevant offers

Digital Living

Secretive billionaire reveals how he toppled Apple in China Facebook is masking our depression, but can it help us get better? How do you know if you're over-doing it on Facebook? British Prime Minister Theresa May calls on social media companies to act Three things Samsung says its Bixby assistant will do that Siri can't How online bullying became an epidemic we're all guilty of It is past time we fully examined the ever-expanding influence of Facebook on our lives What you should think about before buying Apple's cheaper iPad and red iPhone YouTubers claim restrictions targeting gay-themed content Smartphones set to dominate digital payments

A US judge said he would consider whether to preliminarily approve Facebook's second attempt to settle allegations the social networking company violated privacy rights.

Earlier this year, US District Judge Richard Seeborg rejected a proposed class action settlement over Facebook's 'Sponsored Stories' advertising feature. But at a hearing on Thursday in San Francisco federal court, Seeborg was much less critical of a revised proposal and promised a ruling "very shortly".

Five Facebook members filed a lawsuit seeking class-action status against the social networking site, saying its Sponsored Stories feature violated California law by publicising users' "likes" of certain advertisers without paying them or giving them a way to opt out. The case involved over 100 million potential class members.

As part of a proposed settlement reached earlier this year, Facebook agreed to allow members more control over how their personal information is used. Facebook also agreed to pay US$10 million for legal fees and US$10 million to charity, according to court documents.

However, Seeborg rejected the proposed deal in August, questioning why it did not award any money to members.

In a revised proposal, Facebook and plaintiff lawyers said users now could claim a cash payment of up to US$10 each to be paid from a US$20 million total settlement fund. Any money remaining would then go to charity.

The company also said it would engineer a new tool to enable users to view any content that might have been displayed in Sponsored Stories and then opt out if they desire, the court document says.

In court on Thursday, Facebook attorney Michael Rhodes said the settlement provided meaningful protections and that Seeborg's job was to ensure a fair settlement - not write national privacy policy.

"Trust me, I'm not proposing to set grand policy with privacy issues writ large," Seeborg said.

Two children's advocacy groups filed court papers opposing the deal, saying that an opt-in procedure with parental consent should be required before Facebook can use a minor's content in ads.

However, plaintiff attorney Robert Arns said the deal balances the public good with Facebook's ability to run a profitable social networking service.

"We believe we cracked the code so that it's fair," he said.

If Seeborg grants his preliminary approval, outside groups would be able to file further objections before a final hearing.

The case in US District Court, Northern District of California is Angel Fraley et al, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated vs Facebook Inc, 11-cv-1726.

Ad Feedback

- Reuters

Comments

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content