Facebook copyright notice still a Hoax

WILL OREMUS
Last updated 14:47 27/11/2012

Relevant offers

Digital Living

Google wants to know when users, tempted by an online advert, go to the shops Leaked: hundreds of internal Facebook documents on sex, violence, and terrorism Businessman's ransom nightmare at the hands of cyber hackers Instagram is the worst social network for young people's mental health Google's focus on AI means it will get even deeper into our lives Computer course helping 'digitally disadvantaged' saves ailing mother's family Online retail giants force NZ businesses to implement digital strategies Cyberattack hits at least 200,000 victims in 150 countries British researcher Marcus Hutchins finds kill switch, 'accidentally' stops malware crippling computers worldwide New Zealand upping digital security after 'massive' worldwide cyberattack

Remember chain letters? Our era's equivalent are those viral Facebook status messages that refuse to die, no matter how many times they're debunked.

This week's edition is the copyright notice that claims to protect the person posting it from having the information on their profile disclosed, copied, disseminated, etc by Facebook or any of its employees.

It uses lots of big, legal-sounding words and cites things like the Rome Statute, UCC Section 1-308, and the "Berner Convention" (presumably a misspelling of the Berne Convention), but that doesn't give it any more legitimacy than it had the last time it made the rounds, in June.

Here's the full hoax post.

Read the full hoax post that went viral:

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/facebook-debunks-viral-hoax-that-it-owns-users-content-20121127-2a460.html#ixzz2DNmQ7Zq4

Read the full hoax post that went viral:

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/facebook-debunks-viral-hoax-that-it-owns-users-content-20121127-2a460.html#ixzz2DNmQ7Zq4

Facebook hoax post

But as Snopes.com explains, it has no basis in fact.

"Facebook users cannot retroactively negate any of the privacy or copyright terms they agreed to when they signed up for their Facebook accounts nor can they unilaterally alter or contradict any new privacy or copyright terms instituted by Facebook simply by posting a contrary legal notice on their Facebook walls."

Back in June, the hoax capitalised on people's uncertainty over Facebook's debut as a publicly traded company, which in itself had no bearing on users' privacy rights or copyright protections. This time it's playing on people's confusion about Facebook's proposed changes to its terms of service.

Ad Feedback

The proposed changes are real, but no status update that you post will have any bearing on how they affect you. If you want to weigh in on the proposals, you can do that on their site. If enough people comment on the changes, Facebook may even allow its users to vote on them, though the company's representatives have been a little cagey on that point.

But again, just to be clear, referencing a bunch of legal hokum on your Facebook profile will have absolutely no effect on what Facebook can and cannot do with your information. Nor will refusing to post said hokum on your profile open you to any new privacy violations.

-Slate

Comments

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content