US file-sharers caught in Copyright Alert System

ANNE FLAHERTY
Last updated 14:12 26/02/2013

Relevant offers

Digital Living

University collects $100,000 in piracy fines Lightbox's content challenge to Netflix Mayer bets on Firefox boost for Yahoo Virtual Paul McCartney is mind-blowing What does your password mean? Human rights groups' anti-surveillance tool Will Generation Z be as connected as us? Market dramas as giant arrives on internet TV scene Quickflix undaunted by Netflix NZ

American internet users who illegally share music, movies or television shows online could soon receive warning notices from the nation's five major internet service providers.

The Copyright Alert System, organised by the recording and film industry, is being activated this week to target consumers using peer-to-peer software.

Under the new system, complaints will prompt an internet service provider - such as Verizon or AT&T - to notify a customer whose internet address has been detected sharing files illegally.

A person will be given up to six opportunities to stop before the internet provider will take more drastic steps, such as temporarily slowing their connection, or redirecting internet traffic until they acknowledge they received a notice or review educational materials about copyright law.

Consumers who maintain they have been wrongly accused would be forced to pay US$35 to appeal the decision. The fee would be reimbursed if they prevail.

Proponents say the focus is on deterring the average consumer rather than chronic violators.

The director of the organisation behind the system, Jill Lesser of the Center for Copyright Infringement, said in a blog post on Monday that the programme is "meant to educate rather than punish, and direct (users) to legal alternatives".

Each internet provider is expected to implement their own system.

The programme gives each customer five or six "strikes" after a music or film company has detected illegal file-sharing and lodged a complaint.

The first alerts are expected to be educational, while the third and fourth would require the customer to acknowledge that they have received the warnings and understand their behaviour is illegal.

The final warnings are expected to lead to "mitigation measures," such as slowing a person's Internet connection speeds.

Officials involved in the effort acknowledge it's unlikely to stop the biggest violators.

There are ways to disguise an IP address or use a neighbour's connection that is unlocked. Public wireless connections, such as those offered at coffee shops, also won't be monitored.

Ad Feedback

- AP

Comments

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content