Conficker still stumps boffins
BY ASHER MOSES
Relevant offers
Gadgets
The brightest minds in technology and government are finding it "almost impossible" to defeat the Conficker worm, which has infected more than 5 million computers and, experts say, could be used to knock down the internet in entire countries.
The worm, first detected in November last year, spreads rapidly to computers through a flaw in the Windows operating system.
Infected machines are co-opted into a "botnet" army, which can be controlled and used by the hackers to launch unprecedented cyber attacks.
"The general agreement in the security world is that Conficker is the largest threat facing us from a cyber crime point of view ... it has proven to be extremely resilient. It's almost impossible to remove," said Rodney Joffe, a director of the Conficker Working Group formed to defeat the worm.
"The best minds in the world have not managed to crack the code behind this yet."
The scale of the threat has forced the world's largest computer security companies to join together with government around the world in an unusual alliance to pool their resources and solve the problem.
Microsoft has offered a US$250,000 reward for information leading to the identification of the individuals - or rogue governments - behind Conficker.
Those behind the worm can do anything they want with the infected machines including stealing users' banking details or flooding government servers to knock them offline.
"This could be used to launch the mother of all DDoS [distributed denial of service] attacks, it could be used as the basis of major financial fraud, it could be used for major spam runs," Joffe said.
"Even a small portion of the infected machines from Conficker have the ability to actually take away the usability of the internet in an entire country like Australia."
So far the international effort to find a solution has yielded few results, and the number of infected machines has remained fairly stable at 5 million. They include home, business and Government computers.
Joffe, who is also a senior technologist at US communications company Neustar, explained that the remarkable resilience was because Conficker had built-in mechanisms to prevent people from scanning their computers with anti-virus software.
Even for those who wipe their computers clean and start fresh, if they back up any important data on a portable hard drive, the clean machine is reinfected when the drive is connected to the computer.
The worm also spreads automatically between computers on a network and infects machines without the user having to do anything other than switch their computers on.
"If you've been able to disinfect 99 machines out of 100 and one is still infected, it will begin to try to reinfect the others," Joffe said.
Most other botnets can be destroyed by disabling the server used to issue commands to infected machines, but with Conficker the location of this sever changes every day and state-of-the-art cryptography means it's almost impossible to crack.
Every time the security gurus feel they are on to a solution, the hackers send a new version of Conficker to the infected machines that stops them in their tracks.
"Conficker has proven to be the gold standard for botnets. It's rock solid, it's steady and it has mechanisms built in that have made it impossible for us to actually crack," Joffe said.
"As of today we have not been able to crack the cryptography behind it in order to disrupt it by authenticating ourselves as the command and control."
So far the "botnet masters" have been biding their time as the media buzz around Conficker dies down, but they have already sent malicious code to infected machines that co-opts them to send spam emails. Users of infected computers have also been conned with offers to buy fake anti-virus software.
In July, Manchester City Council in Britain was prevented from issuing hundreds of fines after Conficker knocked out parts of its IT system. The infection cost the council £1.5 million in total.
In January, the French Navy had to quarantine its computer network after it was infected with Conficker, forcing aircraft at several air bases to be grounded.
Joffe said that people who are not yet infected and have installed the latest Windows patches and anti-virus software should be safe, as long as yet another version of Conficker is not released.
But he said it was rare for people to have all the relevant patches installed on their computers, and anti-virus software would be of little use to those already infected.
"We're some ways away from being able to take any action, which is what is really concerning us," Joffe said
- © Fairfax NZ News
Sponsored links
Microsoft's man who monitors privacy
'Janitor satellite' made to clean up space
Australia to get R18 rating for games
iPad factory conditions 'better than the norm'
App turns iPhone into adult toy
Review: Samsung Series 7 UA46D7000
Bulgaria could suspend vote on ACTA
Internet in Iran severely disrupted as elections loom
Review: The Darkness 2 for Xbox 360
Nasdaq website disrupted by online attacks
Mallard offers ticket cash back
Men in court after raid on Auckland apartment
Kiwis in cruise ship cocaine bust
No radiation leak on plane, says Fire Service
Second week-long strike for port
Abercrombie stars as Breakers shoot down Hawks
No Kiwi jobs lost in call centre move: Orcon
Apple mobile apps stealing private data
Dragons deny wrongdoing as wee row erupts
15-minute-old newborn gets heart pacemaker
'Starved, beaten' teen weighed just 32kg
From TV to a tent: Family of eight evicted
Men in court after raid on Auckland apartment
Mallard offers ticket cash back
'Starved, beaten' teen weighed just 32kg
Suppression lapses for kidnap accused
Star claims Home and Away racism
Sonny Bill Williams finds rugby boring: mate
Robyn Malcolm lays it all bare
Mallard offers ticket cash back
China 'will see Crafar ruling as racist'
Mallard sells festival tickets online at profit
Should you take your groom's name?
Cyclist: Don't fine us, fix the road
Marryatt skips council debate to play golf
Govt says asset sales will cut debt
At what age is it OK for children to have a smartphone?