No permanent ban for Samsung

Last updated 17:45 18/12/2012
Apple vs Samsung
Reuters
DELICIOUS? A passerby photographs an Apple store logo with his Samsung Galaxy phone.

Relevant offers

Gadgets

New robotic cheetah leaps over hurdles The perfect English butler robot Apple to unveil new iPads next month Startup Kickstarts challenge to VR big guns Review: Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5 Self-driving cars now need a permit in California Kiwis falling behind in green ICT The Apple iPhone 6 worth 168 Rolls-Royces Apple's obsessive 'iSheep' fans 4 million iPhone 6 pre-orders on first day

A US judge has denied Apple's request for a permanent injunction against Samsung's smartphones, depriving the iPhone maker of key leverage in the mobile patent wars.

Apple had been awarded US$1.05 billion in damages in August after a US jury found Samsung had copied critical features of the iPhone and iPad. The Samsung products run on the Android operating system, developed by Google.

After the jury verdict, Apple asked US District Judge Lucy Koh in San Jose to impose a permanent sales ban against 26 mostly older Samsung phones, though any injunction could potentially have been extended to Samsung's newer Galaxy products.

In her order late on Monday, Koh found that Apple had not presented enough evidence to show that its patented features drove consumer demand for the entire iPhone.

"The phones at issue in this case contain a broad range of features, only a small fraction of which are covered by Apple's patents," Koh wrote.

"Though Apple does have some interest in retaining certain features as exclusive to Apple," she continued, "it does not follow that entire products must be forever banned from the market because they incorporate, among their myriad features, a few narrow protected functions."

An Apple spokeswoman declined to comment on Koh's ruling, and a Samsung representative could not immediately be reached.

In a separate order, Koh rejected a bid by Samsung for a new trial based on an allegation that the jury foreman was improperly biased in favor of Apple.

Ad Feedback

- Reuters

Comments

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content