Bounty for shooting drones

KEITH COFFMAN
Last updated 14:32 18/07/2013

Relevant offers

Gadgets

Humans happier with robot overlords: study Dr Who? Teen builds K-9 between cello practice and final-year exams LG teases a circular smart watch Fitbit could be your weight-loss promise to the boss The giant tablet for the whole family HTC One M8 reimagined as a Windows Phone battleship Hands on: Microsoft Surface Pro 3 What to call the big iPhone? Robots that think together Temporary tattoos power electronics with sweat

The farming and ranching town of Deer Trail, Colorado, which boasts that it held the world's first rodeo in 1869, is now considering starting a 21st century tradition - paying bounties to anyone who shoots down an unmanned drone.

Next month, trustees of the town of 600 that lies on the high plains 90km east of Denver will debate an ordinance that would allow residents to purchase a US$25 (NZ$30) hunting license to shoot down ''unmanned aerial vehicles''.

Similar to the bounties governments once paid to hunters who killed animals that preyed on livestock, but only after they produced the ears, the town would pay US$100 (NZ$120) to anyone who could produce the fuselage and tail of a downed drone.

''Either the nose or tail may be damaged, but not both,'' the proposal notes.

The measure was crafted by resident Phillip Steel, a 48-year-old Army veteran with a master's degree in business administration, who acknowledges the whimsical nature of his proposal.

But the expansion of drones for commercial and government use is alarming, he said.

''We don't want to become a surveillance society,'' he said.

He said he has not seen any drones, but that ''some local ranchers'' outside the town limits have seen them.

Under the proposal, hunters could legally shoot down a drone flying under 304m with a 12-gauge or smaller shotgun.

The town also would be required to establish a drone ''recognition program'' for shooters to properly identify the targeted aircraft.

''In no case shall a citizen engage an obviously manned aerial vehicle,'' the draft proposal reads.

Steel said that if the town trustees don't vote to adopt the ordinance, it will go before voters in a special election.

''Yes, it is tongue-in-cheek, but I'm going to vote for it,'' said Dorothy Pisel, one of the town's trustees. 

''It could benefit the town with all the publicity.''

Steel acknowledges his idea is symbolic, but he hopes it will curtail the use of drones over the 1.7-square kilometre burg.

''If you don't want your drone to go down, don't fly it in town,'' he said.

The Federal Aviation Administration did not immediately have a comment.

Ad Feedback

- Reuters

Comments

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content