Major reforms in first 100 days

What will the change of power mean?

Sunday Star Times
Last updated 02:08 09/11/2008
MICHAEL BRADLEY
PM-ELECT: Key says he will call a meeting of public service chief executives and order them to do a line-by-line review of their departments' spending.

Relevant offers

National has pledged to "hit the ground running", bringing in major and controversial reforms within its first 100 days in office.

Leader and Prime Minister-elect John Key will take the tourism portfolio and institute a new post, minister for infrastructure. He will also give Act leader Rodney Hide a cabinet portfolio but he has said he will not have Act's founder and chief theorist, former finance minister Roger Douglas.

However, National needed Act's five seats to win a majority in the house, putting pressure on Key to include Douglas in his cabinet. It will also strengthen Act's influence over policy.

But, Key campaigned on a broadly centrist programme and has no mandate for a sharp turn to the Right.

National says it will pass its tax cuts package into law before Christmas, with the money going into wallets in April next year.

It will also pass National's transitional relief package offering help to those made redundant in the tough economic times ahead.

Key says he will call a meeting of public service chief executives and order them to do a line-by-line review of their departments' spending. A cabinet expenditure control committee or razor gang - a title not used by Key - will then oversee the review of departmental spending.

National plans to introduce a bill reforming the Resource Management Act "to reduce the costs, delays and uncertainties" in the act. This is bound to provoke a bitter fight with environmentalists and the Greens, who see it as allowing a charter for development without enough protection of the environment.

Key will appoint a minister of infrastructure it could be the new list MP Steven Joyce, a wealthy former businessman to reflect his passion for the topic. National has an ambitious plan to boost the country's infrastructure, starting with a $1.5 billion fast broadband network.

The new minister of health, Tony Ryall, will instruct officials to halt the growth in health bureaucracy.

In education, National will introduce its controversial national standards scheme in literacy and numeracy, where pupils are regularly measured against the standards and reports given "in plain English" to parents about how their child is doing.

It will begin work on its $500 million capital investment scheme for schools, and boost fines for parents of truant children.

Ad Feedback

It will introduce legislation toughening the parole and bail laws, clamping down on gangs, and requiring DNA testing for everyone arrested for an imprisonable offence.

Police will gain the power to issue on-the-spot protection orders to protect victims of domestic violence.

Bill English will be deputy prime minister and minister of finance, and Gerry Brownlee could be leader of the house and minister of State-owned enterprises. Nick Smith is likely to get conservation and Murray McCully will probably be minister of foreign affairs.

Lockwood Smith, who made himself unpopular with Key with his controversial remarks about Asian and Pacific workers, is unlikely now to get a major post. Nor is Maurice Williamson, the transport spokesman, who also irritated Key by persistently raising the issue of road tolls during the campaign.

Key has indicated he would be prepared to offer the Maori affairs portfolio to the Maori Party. There has been speculation that Act leader Rodney Hide will become minister of education, although this would be boldly controversial and most unpopular with the education unions.

UnitedFuture leader Peter Dunne has many years' experience as revenue minister, although there have been reports that he might be offered the job of speaker.

National faces strong potential opposition from health and education interests, environmentalists and those fearful that National's budget cuts will damage social services. So Key treads a fine line.

29 comments
SMJ   #29   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

Well if labour had have been re-elected chew on this!!! It's all good in the world when the rich pay more. Just recall the bitching and moaning from the poor people when tax cuts are announced and the rich get more cuts than the poor. At least National know where the money comes from in this country!! With that in mind read on.......

Bar Stool Economics

Ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:

The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.

The fifth would pay $1.

The sixth would pay $3.

The seventh would pay $7.

The eighth would pay $12.

The ninth would pay $18.

The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.

So, that's what they decided to do. The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve. "Since you are all such good customers," he said, "I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20. Drinks for the ten now cost just $80.

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes, so the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free. But what about the other six men - the paying customers? How could they divide the $20 Windfall so that everyone would get his "fair share"?

They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth and sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer.

So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.

And so: The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings)

The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33%savings).

The seventh now pay $5 instead of $7 (28%savings).

The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).

The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).

The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).

Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to drink for free. But once outside the restaurant the men began to compare their savings.

"I only got a dollar out of the $20,"declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man, "but he got $10!"

"Yeah, that's right," exclaimed the fifth man. "I only saved a dollar, too. It's unfair that he got ten times more than me!"

"That's true!!" shouted the seventh man. "Why should he get $10 back when I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!"

"Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in unison. "We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!"

The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next night the tenth man didn't show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!

And that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.

SMJ   #28   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

It's easy to see you are a worker and not an employer Dav. Sue Bradford's proposal to increase of the minimum adult wage to $15.00 an hour would have crippled many companies. Many firms would have laid off workers as they cannot afford to increase their total wage bill so instead of employing 100 workers at $13.00 an hour they could only have employed 85 workers at $15.00.

Years of low unemployment have made it difficult to get low skilled workers. With unemployment rising workers will have to increase their productivity as there will be more competition for the lower skilled jobs.

NZ's track record with regard to productivity on the international stage is nothing less than embarassing! Years of low unemployment coupled with the inability to sack underperforming employees have made us the laughing stock of the industrial world. At least now we've got a government who will listen to both sides of the argument rather than just the workers.

Luke   #27   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

It's the same old faces of the last National Government re-emerging....And what does John Key know about tourism???

Kym Parsons   #26   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

The sight of gay, immigrants dancing around and celebrating John Key and Nationals win in Auckland last night was a joke. Where has the real NZ gone ? And you wonder why we in the South want our political independence from the North.

Kym Parsons Zealandia Independence Project

Dave (Brisbane)   #25   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

I have just returned to Australia, from my first trip back to N.Z. in 25 years.

I returned to N.Z., to investigate the possibility of repatriating - bringing with me, the wealth & experience garnered from 2 and a half decades of trade employment, that is now sadly lacking in the land of my birth.

I left N.Z. in the 1980's, after the former National Government provided me with no other option, by retrenching my position, (as a newly qualified tradesperson), along with several thousand of my similarly qualified colleagues.

This, and other short-sighted acts perpetrated by former Governments, have served only to leave N.Z. bereft of the skilled and highly trained workforce that is now required to re-build & fortify N.Z. against the economic challenges of a global financial crisis.

Alas, I fear that the election of another National Government in 2008 will only serve to re-visit the mass exodus of bright, qualified young Kiwis - as was the case with my generation, in the 1980's.

Until N.Z. can offer the wages, conditions of employment, and most importantly - hope, to it's current generation of job seekers, I fear that the people of New Zealand will be re-visited by the malaise that punctuated the N.Z. psyche over 25 years ago.

That is the challenge that confronts John Keys, and may he serve to prove me wrong.

oli   #24   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

what a sad day in NZ's history!back to the bad old days.

Mike   #23   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

With Roger Douglas back in the fray, I am seriously considering leaving New Zealand. Such a shame people have voted for personality over politics.

I fully support increasing political education in schools. There seems to be little understanding of the implications of a centre-right government.

Diane   #22   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

This choice has now made me more determined to move to Australia

Geraldine Watson   #21   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

I fully agree. Beam me up Scottie there is no intelligent life down here

cf   #20   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

We're Screwed. Conman in power.......... They'll only get 3 years to screw the country, just hope we can get out of the mess again at the end of it...


Show 1-19 of 29 comments
Special offers
Opinion poll

The government will shortly be asking the public what it thinks about mining on conservation land. Do you think:

Go for it, NZ needs all the gold it can get

No way, keep diggers off our precious landscapes

Careful mining under strict rules should be allowed

Vote Result

Related story: (See story)

Featured Promotions