Battle to save cathedral far from over

CHARLES ANDERSON
Last updated 05:00 01/06/2014
Tourist photographs ChristChurch Cathedral
Joseph Johnson

AS IT STANDS: A tourist photographs the damaged Christ Church Cathedral.

Relevant offers

The Rebuild

Johnny Moore: Christchurch risks becoming a 'beige dystopia' Westpac closures reflect bigger trend affecting small town New Zealand Fendalton landowners paid hundreds of thousands of dollars compo prior to February earthquake High Court denies uninsured Quake Outcasts' appeal Christchurch Dilemmas: How to rebuild the city's heart Opinion: Pegasus - a 'vibrant village' where people know nature and their neighbours Private insurers urged Government not to publish booklet for Canterbury homeowners Government close to buying last two sites for Christchurch's Performing Arts Precinct Christchurch building firm H&R Garlick folds after 20 years in business Cave Rock apartment owners will not accept 'full and final' settlement offer from IAG

A group of Anglicans in a small Canterbury community are vowing to take the battle for Christ Church Cathedral to the court of public opinion after a judge lifted a stay on a planned demolition of the 110-year-old building.

Justice Graham Panckhurst released findings on Friday lifting the stay on demolition of the cathedral.

However a small group of Anglicans say the fight is not over.

Akaroa resident Mike Norris organised a group of parishioners to meet and discuss what the decision meant for their battle to restore the cathedral.

"This is the beginning of the next stage of the campaign," he said. "We have gone through the courts, which has not advanced our cause, now it is time to go through the court of public opinion."

In March 2012, the Church Property Trustees (CPT) resolved to demolish the cathedral down to a level of 2 to 3 metres.

In November 2012, the High Court halted the planned demolition after the Great Christchurch Buildings Trust (GCBT), of which Norris is a trustee, sought a binding ruling on whether the Anglican diocese's plans breached an act of Parliament protecting church buildings.

Justice Lester Chisholm found that the terms the CPT held the cathedral under required them to maintain a cathedral on the site, but not necessarily the cathedral as it was before the earthquakes.

Norris said there was concern over how a small group of people could decide the future of a structure that meant so much to so many people.

"We have to get the silent majority to speak up and say they are appalled by this destruction."

Bishop Victoria Matthews said although permission had been granted she was under no illusion that the demolition would happen soon.

The diocese had hoped to build a modern cathedral on the site within 10 years.

Ad Feedback

- Sunday Star Times

Comments

Special offers
Opinion poll

Is it worth spending extra to repair heritage buildings?

Yes, Christchurch needs to invest in its heritage buildings

No, we should embrace modern design if it is cheaper and quicker

Only some heritage buildings are worth the money

Vote Result

Related story: Landmark church nearly $1m short

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content